Assessment Of Perception Of Covid-19 Infection And Vaccination Among Health CareWorkers In Mecca, Saudi Arabia2022
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
COVID-19 still poses a threat to healthcare workers (HCW), COVID-19 vaccines were made available to the public by the end of 2020. However, little is known about COVID-19 vaccine perception and also booster dose (CBD) among healthcare workers (HCW) worldwide. limited COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare assistants (HCAs) may adversely impact adults and also older, who are at increased risk for severe COVID-19 infections. Saudi Arabia is one of the areas most affected by the COVID-19pandemic in the Saudi Arabia. Healthcare workers are among those at high risk of contracting the virus, and a vital source of information and trust in vaccines to the community. The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated vaccine have highlighted vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs). Vaccine hesitancy among this group existed prior to the pandemic and particularly centered on influenza vaccination. Being a physician and nursing having more advanced education and previous vaccination habits are frequently associated with vaccine acceptance. The relationship between age and caring for patients on COVID-19 vaccination is unclear, with studies providing opposing results. Aim of the study: To assess the perception of Covid-19 infection and vaccination among health care workers in Makkah Al-Mokarramah, Saudi Arabia2022. Method: Cross sectional study, was conducted among Saudi Arabia health care workers in primary health care centers in Makkah Al-Mukarramah. Data were gathered through the use of a self-administered questionnaire. A convenience sampling technique was utilized to collect the data. has been send to the study participants through social media platforms and email. Our total participants were (135). Results: the majority of participant (73.3%) have high of the perception towards Covid-19 infection and vaccination followed by (22.2%) of participant average while Range (5-18) and mean ±SD (14.733+2.794), while a significantly relation were X2 103.6 and P=0.001 Conclusion: There is a good perception of some hesitancy in receiving the vaccination among health care workers in all countries. The introduction of personalized education, risk communication, and deliberate policy could help to reduce the number of people who are unwilling to take of Covid-19 infection vaccination, action is needed to enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this important population with health care workers playing an important role to build vaccine confidence and trust among employees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».