A review of life cycle impacts of different pathways for converting food waste into livestock feed
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The concept of direct valorization of food waste to livestock feed has garnered increasing attention as a potential solution to reduce the significant environmental impacts of both food waste disposal and livestock production. Much of that interest lies in the arena of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) since it is the preferred approach to evaluate the systems-level environmental performance of agri-food systems. It remains unclear, however, which specific substrate types and technologies should be prioritized for detailed LCA scrutiny under various regional and socio-economic contexts. This review aims to contribute towards filling this knowledge gap by synthesizing existing literature on the topic, identifying areas of improvement, and suggesting priority future research directions. Towards that end, 27 relevant research articles found through a keyword search and shortlisted using the PRISMA method and specific exclusion criteria were reviewed. The results showed that mixed food waste from households, supermarkets, and restaurants was the most studied substrate. A majority (56 %) of the studies either investigated a theoretical assumption-based system or did not include any information at all regarding the technology readiness of their studied system. Six of the seven commercial-scale facilities found in the review were from Asia, reflecting the supportive regulatory environments in this context. The majority of the studies identifying monogastrics as the target species indicated the valorized feed to be incomplete and requiring conventional feed supplementation. The review highlighted the substrate drying process as the largest contributor to the life cycle environmental impacts of food waste to feed valorization, accounting for up to 94 % of Global Warming Potential (GWP) burdens. Specific hotspot mitigation measures were discussed, such as adopting renewable energy sources, energy recycling, and more efficient substrate drying technology. Several LCA-specific issues were also highlighted in this review, such as ambiguity regarding the selection of impact categories, reporting single score results, or using uncommon units. Based on these findings, the review highlights the need for more LCA studies on commercial scale food waste to feed valorization systems, the need to further explore the impacts of avoided landfill emissions, and conduct more holistic assessments taking into account infrastructure availability and techno-economic viability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle