The Use of ICD-9-CM Coding to Identify COVID-19 Diagnoses and Determine Risk Factors for 30-Day Death Rate in Hospitalized Patients in Italy: Retrospective Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: In Italy, it has been difficult to accurately quantify hospital admissions of patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis using the Hospital Information System (HIS), mainly due to the heterogeneity of codes used in the hospital discharge records during different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define a specific combination of codes to identify the COVID-19 hospitalizations within the HIS and to investigate the risk factors associated with mortality due to COVID-19 among patients admitted to Italian hospitals in 2020. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the hospital discharge records, provided by more than 1300 public and private Italian hospitals. Inpatient hospitalizations were detected by implementing an algorithm based on specific International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code combinations. Hospitalizations were analyzed by different clinical presentations associated with COVID-19 diagnoses. In addition, 2 multivariable Cox regression models were performed among patients hospitalized "due to COVID-19" from January 1 to December 31, 2020, to investigate potential risk factors associated with 30-day death and the temporal changes over the course of the pandemic; in particular, the 30-day death rates during the first and the second waves were analyzed across 3 main geographical areas (North, Center, and South and Islands) and by discharge wards (ordinary and intensive care). RESULTS: We identified a total of 325,810 hospitalizations with COVID-19-related diagnosis codes. Among these, 73.4% (n=239,114) were classified as "due to COVID-19," 14.5% (n=47,416) as "SARS-CoV-2 positive, but not due to COVID-19," and 12.1% (n=39,280) as "suspected COVID-19" hospitalizations. The cohort of patients hospitalized "due to COVID-19" included 205,048 patients, with a median age of 72 years and a higher prevalence of male patients (n=124,181, 60.6%). The overall 30-day death rate among hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 was 9.9 per 1000 person-days. Mortality was lower for women (hazard ratio [HR]=0.83; P<.001) and for patients coming from high migration pressure countries, especially Northern Africans (HR=0.65; P<.001) and Central and Eastern Europeans (HR=0.66; P<.001), compared to patients coming from Italy and high-income countries. In the southern regions and the Islands, mortality was higher compared to the northern regions (HR=1.17; P<.001), especially during the second wave of COVID-19 among patients with a transfer to intensive care units (HR=2.52; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the algorithm is the first attempt to define, at a national level, selection criteria for identifying COVID-19 hospitalizations within the HIS. The implemented algorithm will be used to monitor the pandemic over time, and the patients selected in 2020 will be followed up in the next years to assess the long-term effects of COVID-19.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».