MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392112011 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2024.a919912

Transverse Disciplines: Queer-Feminist, Anti-racist, and Decolonial Approaches to the University ed. by Simone Pfleger and Carrie Smith (review)

2024· article· en· W4392112011 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faye Stewart

Notice bibliographique

RevueGerman Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender Diversity and Inequality
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueerSociologyGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Transverse Disciplines: Queer-Feminist, Anti-racist, and Decolonial Approaches to the University ed. by Simone Pfleger and Carrie Smith Faye Stewart Transverse Disciplines: Queer-Feminist, Anti-racist, and Decolonial Approaches to the University. Edited by Simone Pfleger and Carrie Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. Pp. xx + 379. Cloth $80.00. ISBN 9781487508456. What futures can be imagined for German studies? Appearing at a time of multiple and converging academic crises—including the widely-decried crisis of the humanities—Simone Pfleger and Carrie Smith's edited volume, Transverse Disciplines, speculates about where the discipline is going, what is possible, and how it might navigate changes necessitated by institutional mandates, financial urgencies, and political realities. The answers this book offers embrace heterogeneity and rethink the field, its positionality vis-à-vis diversity, and its relationships to other area studies and adjacent disciplines. Together with an international slate of contributors, Smith and Pfleger reframe this watershed moment as grounds for the fertilization and metamorphosis of both the discipline and our institutions by cultivating sustainable connections, fostering feminist collaborations, amplifying marginalized voices, and centering antiracist, decolonial, queer, and anticapitalist practices. Pfleger and Smith situate this collection as a rallying cry in the midst of intersecting emergencies. A 2021 preface, "Forging Alliances in the Burning Present," reflects on the book's publication at the junctures between three intertwined crises: the global COVID-19 pandemic; violence against Black and Indigenous, as well as other People of Color, and the resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement; and the ecological damage and multiplying disasters linked to climate change. If nothing else, they contend, these crises reveal our interconnectedness and interdependence while also exposing the unsustainability of attempts to "save" German studies, ensure its "survival," or make it more "resilient" by reifying disciplinary boundaries or tokenizing diversity initiatives. This urgent call for transformation echoes the work being done in other areas of the profession, such as by the DDGC Collective (Diversity, Decolonization, and the German Curriculum), whose co-founders Regine Criser and Ervin Malakaj contend in the 2020 edited volume Diversity and Decolonization in German Studies that the discipline is at a crossroads, and that the dismantling of racist oppression and a pivot toward social justice are imperative to reorient and reinvigorate it. Recent special issues, debates, and forum essays in The German Quarterly and Seminar also attest to the growing commitment to decolonization discourses and endeavors. The essays in "Indigenous and German Studies," a 2019 special issue of Seminar co-edited by Smith, together with Renae Watchman and Markus Stock, are cited by several contributors to Transverse Disciplines as especially formative in their thinking about disciplinary structures and epistemologies. How does one approach disciplines transversally? The contributions offer diverse visions. In a co-authored introduction, editors Pfleger and Smith explain their choice of the adjectival form "transverse" over other modifiers or prefixes to denote interconnectivity [End Page 175] achieved through dynamic movement, gathering, and community building (14). For Maria Stehle, "transverse" similarly "describes the reach across various conceptual entities or disciplines, to assemble anew, to defy existing structures, and search for new connection" (266). In the opening chapter, Claudia Breger historicizes the project of Germanistik, arguing that transversality always has been at its core. Taking to heart the model of education espoused by bell hooks in Teaching to Transgress, Jamele Watkins seeks to inspire others to challenge anti-Blackness by centering Black German studies in the curriculum. For Jennifer Hoyer, transversal intersections with non-humanities fields like mathematics produce novel methodologies and epistemologies. For Helen Finch and Evan Torner, the transdisciplining necessitated by the shrinking of language and literature programs leads to generative partnerships. Smith's own contribution assesses "well-functioning" yet largely invisible university infrastructures as stabilized by the pillars of critical antiracist, queer-feminist, and decolonial thinking (244–45). Transverse Disciplines offers a toolkit for transformation. It consists of a co-authored preface and introduction and three sections featuring fourteen essays by German studies and cross-affiliated scholars in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The first section, "Situating Disciplinarity: Diagnoses, Genealogies, and Possibilities," examines the humanities and Germanistik for opportunities to recompose them expansively and inclusively. Three of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,089

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0070,010
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,183
Tête enseignante GPT0,353
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGerman Studies ReviewMême sujetGender Diversity and InequalityTravaux en français237 207