MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392163405 · doi:10.1353/jowh.2024.a920126

Natalie Zemon Davis: A Remembrance

2024· article· en· W4392163405 sur OpenAlex
Bonnie G. Smith

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of women's history · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtHistoryArt historyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Natalie Zemon Davis:A Remembrance Bonnie G. Smith (bio) The origins of Natalie Zemon Davis's life as a pioneer of women's and gender history—as in historical scholarship tout court—sit like a legend in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It was then that a multi-paged mimeographed bibliography of books and other sources on the history of European women circulated among those wanting to study and research that field. The problem with pursuing this topic, we had been told, was that there were no primary sources, no scholarship, and no histories of such women. It was barren terrain, and scholars repeated age-old warnings of the futility of such inquiries to women who wanted to study or do scholarship themselves. Jill Ker Conway and Natalie Zemon Davis, then at the University of Toronto, gave the lie to this assertion when they produced this bibliography. The warnings and the aspirations came during America's "little wars" in Vietnam and elsewhere, along with an upswing in civil rights and feminist activism. During the 1960s, scholarship on US women began to take flight, yielding works by Gerda Lerner and Ann Firor Scott who asked, for example, how the biographer of the celebrated men in the Otis family could have entirely omitted Mercy Otis Warren. Almost miraculously, the Conway-Davis bibliography—the fruit of intense labor—offered inspiration to would-be scholars of European women. The bibliography was to many of us—not to exaggerate, as I was there, but to repeat—magical. Davis described her own trajectory between her graduate work in the 1950s and the several intellectual apotheoses shaping her intellectual life over the decades. In graduate school, she had to read Christine de Pisan's Book of the City of Ladies, a Renaissance defense of womankind. This experience, she claimed, was "a delight" as she had never read anything by a woman either in her undergraduate or graduate courses until then. She had also been assigned the work of the medieval Muslim philosopher and traveler Ibn Khaldun—another first. Taking up the enthusiasm for social history and Marxist scholarship at the time, she turned to studying women printers in Lyon—not women of the court—in the early modern period. However, her twin forays into the works of Christine and Khaldun, along with the rise of subaltern studies and attention to enslaved peoples, sparked—perhaps ignited is more accurate—her determination not to be a Europeanist but to study the world's peoples. However, by that time, Davis had become renowned for her attention to the details of everyday life and close-up comparisons of individuals. Global history, in contrast, studied "big" and world-shaking phenomena. Davis's strategy became bringing individuals, often from different cultures and circumstances, onto the world [End Page 10] stage. From there, she charted the intermingli ng of languages, lifeways, skills, beliefs, values, and know-how across cultures. From the same stage, she would bring together and interrogate a new historical "intimacy"—global, but up-close, individual, social, and gendered. Virtually the entire corpus of Davis's scholarship took shape around these categories. For all that this might sound sociological, readers of Davis's work know that it is lively, full of odd, sober, self-fashioned, wily, erudite, and altogether unique characters. In Davis's telling, these figures—humble, seemingly ordinary, or grand—emerge full of historical import and rich in life experiences from which we can profitably draw images of the past. Can one put down a Davis book from boredom? Davis's work was transformative on many levels, including her determination to focus on characters interacting with one another and having conversations, thus her simultaneous emphasis on the flow of languages among disparate peoples and the creation of multilingual dictionaries in many histories structured around cross-cultural actors. Davis developed her own intimate style of relating to those in the academic world and even outside it. In her presentations, she spoke relevantly to any audience, including local historical figures. Davis seemed to craft a new essay for every occasion, many of which remain pivotal. Refusing to resort to her specialty or older writings, on receiving an honorary degree from the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,634
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,188
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle