MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392179931 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2024.03.3.28

Assembly’s Resident-Fellow Members Move Ahead to Make a Difference

2024· article· en· W4392179931 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Assembly Committee of Area Residents and Fellows

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceHistoryPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article APA & MeetingsFull AccessAssembly's Resident-Fellow Members Move Ahead to Make a DifferenceAssembly Committee of Area Residents and FellowsAssembly Committee of Area Residents and FellowsPublished Online:26 Feb 2024https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2024.03.3.28AbstractThe APA Assembly is an excellent place for residents and fellows across the country to begin their involvement with APA.The APA Assembly comprises over 200 regionally elected psychiatrists who advocate for the professional interests of psychiatrists and equitable, high-quality psychiatric care throughout the United States and Canada. Assembly members draft, debate, and vote on policy proposals, especially Action Papers and position statements, which, if approved, undergo further review by the seniormost APA leadership for potential implementation.Since 1987, the Assembly has provided an essential link to APA members in residency and fellowship training through resident-fellow member (RFM) representatives in the Assembly. The Assembly Committee of Area Resident-Fellow Members (ACORF) includes 14 RFMs who represent psychiatry trainee interests at the biannual APA Assembly and Area Council meetings. APA is divided into seven regions, or Areas, each of which has an Area Council. Aspiring ACORF representatives apply to and are voted on by their respective Area Council; the deadlines for application vary by Area and typically are in the late winter or early spring. When elected, ACORF representatives are expected to serve two-year terms in the Assembly: as RFM deputy representative for the first year and as RFM representative for the second year.ACORF works on developing advocacy initiatives through Action Papers and position statements in collaboration with other Assembly and APA components. Furthermore, ACORF members serve on APA councils and workgroups with specialized roles.Most recently, leading up to the November 2023 Assembly Meeting in Baltimore, ACORF members met monthly and drafted four Action Papers. ACORF's Action Papers were among the 19 Action Papers submitted for consideration at the meeting:Promoting Guidelines for the Prevention of Patient Assaults on Mental Healthcare Employees: Proposes that APA develop a resource document providing general guidelines toward preventing patient assaults on mental health care employees in psychiatric care settings.Resident Physician Collective Bargaining: Proposes that APA create a public-facing position statement in support of a healthier workforce through improving resident physician compensation to a level that is both commensurate with one's level of training and keeps pace with rising costs of living. Also proposes outlining the appropriate general roles and boundaries of resident unions.Highlighting Suicide Among Resident Physicians, Its Risk Factors, and Relevant Recommendations: Proposes that APA's Council on Medical Education and Lifelong Learning and ACORF collaboratively develop a position statement regarding the prevention of and risk factors associated with suicide among resident physicians.Creating a Resource Guide to Address Gambling Disorder in Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Communities: Proposes that APA create a resource guide for health care professionals to address gambling disorder in AAPI populations, utilizing insights from addiction medicine and upholding cultural humility.All four Action Papers were debated and passed at last fall's Assembly meeting and are now undergoing further review by relevant APA components and the Joint Reference Committee. (This committee serves as a clearinghouse of items between the Board and/or Assembly and the councils.) ACORF's success can be attributed to its representatives' enthusiasm for advocacy and openness to seek and accept feedback from other APA members with expertise in topics addressed by Action Papers.Topics of future Action Papers being drafted by ACORF tentatively include suggested DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria revisions, substance use regulation, the intersection of video gaming and gambling disorder, patient gender identity, and Medicaid reform.Overall, ACORF is an important venue for resident psychiatrists to advocate for their communities. It provides outstanding opportunities for professional networking and preparation for future leadership and advocacy roles. ACORF welcomes and encourages greater resident and fellow participation in APA. Residents and fellows who would like to collaborate with or share advocacy ideas with ACORF are welcome to contact LaToya Coles at [email protected].The members of ACORF are Richard Zhang, M.D., M.A. (chair), Kendrick Abad, D.O., Reid Black, M.D., Allison Chang, M.D., Paul Glasheen, M.D., M.P.P., Daniel Grine, M.D., Tremearne Hotz, M.D., Poojajeet Khaira, M.D., Anthony Kulukulualani, M.D., Akshita Lalendran, M.D., Kathleen Naeher, M.D., Justin Nguyen, D.O., M.P.H., Brooke Olson, M.D., and Marc Ruszaj, M.D.ResourceMore information about ACORF ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,097
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,425
Écart entre enseignants0,384 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetGlobal Health Workforce IssuesTravaux en français237 207