MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392186144 · doi:10.1101/2024.02.26.24303379

Association of Structural Forms of 17q21.31 with the Risk of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and <i>MAPT</i> Sub-haplotypes

2024· preprint· en· W4392186144 sur OpenAlexaff
Hui Wang, Timothy S. Chang, Beth A. Dombroski, Po‐Liang Cheng, Yaqin Si, Albert Tucci, Vishakha Patil, Leopoldo Valiente‐Banuet, Kurt Farrell, Catriona McLean, Laura Molina‐Porcel, Rajput Alex, Peter Paul De Deyn, Nathalie Le Bastard, Marla Gearing, Laura Donker Kaat, John C. van Swieten, Elise G.P. Dopper, Bernardino Ghetti, Kathy L. Newell, Claire Troakes, Justo Garcı́a de Yébenes, Alberto Rábano‐Gutierrez, Tina Meller, Wolfgang H. Oertel, Gesine Respondek, María Stamelou, Thomas Arzberger, Sigrun Roeber, Ulrich Müller, Franziska Hopfner, Pau Pástor, Alexis Brice, Alexandra Dürr, Isabelle Le Ber, Thomas G. Beach, Geidy E. Serrano, Lili‐Naz Hazrati, Irene Litvan, Rosa Rademakers, Owen A. Ross, Douglas Galasko, Adam L. Boxer, Bruce L. Miller, Willian W. Seeley, Vivianna M. Van Deerlin, Edward B. Lee, Charles L. White, Huw R. Morris, Rohan de Silva, John F. Crary, Alison Goate, Jeffrey S. Friedman, Yuk Yee Leung, Giovanni Coppola, Adam C. Naj, Li‐San Wang, Dennis W. Dickson, Günter U. Höglinger, Jung‐Ying Tzeng, Daniel H. Geschwind, Wan‐Ping Lee

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthKing's College LondonCurePSPJustus Liebig Universität GießenUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversity of PennsylvaniaDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative ErkrankungenLarry L. Hillblom Foundation
Mots-clésProgressive supranuclear palsyAssociation (psychology)HaplotypeMedicinePsychologyDiseaseGeneticsPathologyBiologyAllele

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Importance The chromosome 17q21.31 region, containing a 900 Kb inversion that defines H1 and H2 haplotypes, represents the strongest genetic risk locus in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). In addition to H1 and H2, various structural forms of 17q21.31, characterized by the copy number of α, β, and γ duplications, have been identified. However, the specific effect of each structural form on the risk of PSP has never been evaluated in a large cohort study. Objective To assess the association of different structural forms of 17q.21.31, defined by the copy numbers of α, β, and γ duplications, with the risk of PSP and MAPT sub-haplotypes. Design, setting, and participants Utilizing whole genome sequencing data of 1,684 (1,386 autopsy confirmed) individuals with PSP and 2,392 control subjects, a case-control study was conducted to investigate the association of copy numbers of α, β, and γ duplications and structural forms of 17q21.31 with the risk of PSP. All study subjects were selected from the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) Umbrella NG00067.v7. Data were analyzed between March 2022 and November 2023. Main outcomes and measures The main outcomes were the risk (odds ratios [ORs]) for PSP with 95% CIs. Risks for PSP were evaluated by logistic regression models. Results The copy numbers of α and β were associated with the risk of PSP only due to their correlation with H1 and H2, while the copy number of γ was independently associated with the increased risk of PSP. Each additional duplication of γ was associated with 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04-1.17; P = 0.0018) fold of increased risk of PSP when conditioning H1 and H2. For the H1 haplotype, addition γ duplications displayed a higher odds ratio for PSP: the odds ratio increases from 1.21 (95%CI 1.10-1.33, P = 5.47 × 10 -5 ) for H1β1γ1 to 1.29 (95%CI 1.16-1.43, P = 1.35 × 10 -6 ) for H1β1γ2, 1.45 (95%CI 1.27-1.65, P = 3.94 × 10 -8 ) for H1β1γ3, and 1.57 (95%CI 1.10-2.26, P = 1.35 × 10 -2 ) for H1β1γ4. Moreover, H1β1γ3 is in linkage disequilibrium with H1c (R 2 = 0.31), a widely recognized MAPT sub-haplotype associated with increased risk of PSP. The proportion of MAPT sub-haplotypes associated with increased risk of PSP (i.e., H1c, H1d, H1g, H1o, and H1h) increased from 34% in H1β1γ1 to 77% in H1β1γ4. Conclusions and relevance This study revealed that the copy number of γ was associated with the risk of PSP independently from H1 and H2. The H1 haplotype with more γ duplications showed a higher odds ratio for PSP and were associated with MAPT sub-haplotypes with increased risk of PSP. These findings expand our understanding of how the complex structure at 17q21.31 affect the risk of PSP. Key Points Question Do large copy number variations (i.e., α, β, and γ) inside 17q21.31 contribute to the risk of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) independently from the H1 and H2 haplotypes? Do structural forms of 17q21.31, characterized by combinations of α, β, and γ, present divergent risk to the development of PSP? Are structural forms of 17q21.31 associated with MAPT sub-haplotypes, such as H1c? Findings In this case-control study of 1,684 individuals with PSP and 2,392 control subjects, the copy number of γ duplication was independently associated with the risk of the disease. H1 haplotypes with more γ duplications (H1β1γ2, H1β1γ3, and H1β1γ4) displayed a higher odds ratio for PSP when compared to H1β1γ1. Notably, H1β1γ3 was observed to be in linkage disequilibrium with H1c, a widely recognized MAPT sub-haplotype associated with PSP. Meaning The association between the H1 and H2 haplotypes and PSP involves multiple contributing factors, including the copy number of γ duplication.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxiv→Même sujetParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→