MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392406081 · doi:10.1016/j.nsa.2024.103990

Longitudinal relationships between depression and cardiovascular disease risk in two major population cohorts

2024· article· en· W4392406081 sur OpenAlex
Thomas P. Zonneveld, Anil P. S. Ori, Rada R Veeneman, Jentien M. Vermeulen, R. Taros, Wiepke Cahn, Connie R. Bezzina, Anja Lok, Karin J. H. Verweij, Jorien L. Treur

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeuroscience Applied · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Health and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDepression (economics)DiseasePopulationMedicineDemographyGerontologyInternal medicineEnvironmental healthEconomicsSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Depression is one of the most common mental illnesses worldwide. People who have been diagnosed with depression have a reduced life expectancy of 10-15 years, which can partly be explained by an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [1]. It is not yet clear exactly why depression is associated with cardiovascular disease risk. The associations could be due to causal mechanisms, in which case important mediating factors need to be considered, including lifestyle, psychotropic medication use, and social influences [2]. Additionally, while there is evidence that both depression and cardiovascular disease presents differently across biological sexes and different ethnic groups, there is currently a stark lack of studies in non-white European populations.<br/><br/>Objective: The aim of this multi-ethnic study is to assess evidence for potentially causal effects between depression and cardiovascular disease risk across two major cohorts: The Lifelines cohort (N=167,770, predominately white European ancestry, three time-points available) [3] and the HELIUS cohort (N=4671 Dutch, 3369 South-Asian Surinamese, 4458 African Surinamese, 2735 Ghanaian, 4200 Turkish, 4502 Moroccan, two time-points available) [4]. Additionally, we intend to study whether lifestyle (e.g. physical activity, BMI, smoking, diabetes), social factors (e.g. loneliness, perceived social support), and psychotropic medication use mediate these effects. Lastly, we aim to analyse whether the aforementioned relationships differ across biological sexes and ethnic groups.<br/><br/>Methods: In order to study the bidirectional longitudinal relationships between depression and cardiovascular disease risk, we will use random-intercept cross-lagged panel models [5]. The random intercepts capture time-invariant individual level differences in the data, which allows one to capture unmodelled mediators and to separate individual deviations of the group mean from potentially causal longitudinal relationships between observed variables. In the model, depression as well as cardiovascular disease can be considered as both an exposure and outcome. By conducting ‘nested’ models, in which some of the paths are omitted, it can be tested whether it is more likely that depression precedes changes in cardiovascular disease risk, or the reverse. The main variables of interest are depression (measured as depressive symptoms) and cardiovascular disease risk (measured as mean blood pressure, metabolic syndrome, ECG variables). One can also include mediators in the model; we will include sex, ethnicity, lifestyle factors (compound or physical activity, smoking, diabetes and BMI separately), social mediators (compound or loneliness, perceived social support and perceived discrimination separately), and psychotropic medication use.<br/><br/>Hypotheses: We expect to find that depression and cardiovascular disease are longitudinally associated in both directions, but that there is stronger evidence that depression increases subsequent cardiovascular disease risk. Additionally, we hypothesize that these associations are mediated by factors such as smoking, physical activity, medication use, and loneliness. However, we cannot be sure yet about the relative strengths of the mentioned factors. Lastly, we expect to find differences in the strengths of the associations between men and women and across different ethnic backgrounds.<br/>Conclusion: Data analysis is currently still ongoing, results will be presented at the ECNP workshop in March 2024.<br/><br/>References<br/>[1] Correll, C.U., Solmi, M., Veronese, N., Bortolato, B., Rosson, S., Santonastaso, P., Thapa-Chhetri, N., Fornaro, M., Gallicchio, D., Collantoni, E., Pigato, G., Favaro, A., Monaco, F., Kohler, C., Vancampfort, D., Ward, P.B., Gaughran, F., Carvalho, A.F., Stubbs, B., 2017. Prevalence, incidence and mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with pooled and specific severe mental illness: a large-scale meta-analysis of 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls. World Psychiatry 16, 163-180.<br/>[2] Berk, M., Kohler-Forsberg, O., Turner, M., Penninx, B.W.J.H., Wrobel, A., Firth, J., Loughman, A., Reavley, N.J., McGrath, J.J., Momen, N. C., Plana-Ripoll, O., O'Neil, A., Siskind, D., Williams, L.J., Carvalho, A.F., Schmaal, L., Walker, A.J., Dean, O., Walder, K., Berk, L., Dodd, S., Yung, A.R., Marx, W., 2023. Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management. World Psychiatry 22(3), 366-387.<br/>[3] Sijtsma, A., Rienks, J., van der Harst, P., Navis, G., Rosmalen, J.G.M., Dotinga, A., 2022. Cohort Profile Update: Lifelines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank. Int J Epidemiol 51(5), 295-302.<br/>[4] Snijder, M.B., Galenkamp, H., Prins, M., Derks, E.M., Peters, R.J.G., Zwinderman, A.H., Stronks, K., 2017. Cohort profile: the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. BMJ Open 7(12), e017873.<br/>[5] Hamaker, E.L., Kuiper, R.M., Grasman, R.P., 2015. A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychol Methods 20(1), 102-116.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,359

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle