The Secret Garden Art Novel ™ by Frances Hodgson Burnett (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Secret Garden Art Novel ™ by Frances Hodgson Burnett Angelica Shirley Carpenter (bio) The Secret Garden Art Novel ™ by Frances Hodgson Burnett. Introduction and Annotations by Maria H. Frawley, Marion Gymnich, and Amy P. Wong. Bond & Grace Co., 2022. Here is a new kind of book inspired by The Secret Garden. Weighing in at almost five pounds, the 260-page, ten-by-thirteen-inch coffee table book is the first of a series from a new publisher, Bond & Grace. This "Art Novel™" is not a novel about art or artists; instead, it seems a distant cousin to an "artist's book," a work of art in book form. An artist's book is usually one project—book, content, and art—created by one person. This new, annotated edition of The Secret Garden, with a list price of $395, contains more than fifty pieces of widely varying original art by twelve different artists, eleven of them women. With their first Art Novel™, Bond & Grace hopes to carve out a special niche within the coffee table book market currently dominated by nonfiction, photo memoirs, and artist biographies. The three young women who founded the company, Jacqueline Bond, Ayana Christie, and Maggie Lemark, consider the featured artists to be not just illustrators but visual collaborators in the project. They hope to breed progress for women artists in a field where, they say, 87% of artists in museums, galleries, and art fairs are still white men. So this Art Novel™, if it becomes a genre, is unique. The hardcover book is handsome and well made. Even the mailing box is beautiful, with a black and white William Morris-like floral print on the outside and messages and elegant drawings on the interior. This opens to a white canvas bag with a drawstring closure of gray satin ribbons. The bag contains the book in a sturdy black cloth clamshell box, tied with white ribbons, along with a brochure and a sixty-eight-page color booklet titled Art Foreword, which is a catalogue with photographs and information about the artists and all the pictures from the book. This brochure, along with captions in the book, explains that the art pieces include oil and acrylic on canvas, photographs, set designs, hand-created sculptures, paint and thread creations, and fiber-based art, to name just some media used. On the publisher's website, the original artworks, ranging in price from $560 to $16,800, are for sale, with 80% of the sale price going to the artist. The book is bound in gray cloth with gold foil embossing and a light green vegan leather spine. Its pages and bindings are sewn. Floral end-papers in green, white, and lavender again echo William Morris and set a palate for the interior, publisher-designed decorations of leaves and flowers. A pink satin ribbon bookmark adds to a lush, feminine impression. "A trio of PhD scholars," Maris H. Frawley, Marion Gymnich, and Amy R. Wong, who specialize, respectively, in medical history, Victorian British literature, and identity formation, provide the introduction and annotations throughout the novel's text. The ten-page introduction contains photos of Burnett and her book covers, plus pictures of items and advertisements from her lifetime. [End Page 336] Annotations, printed in green to stand out from the novel's black type-face, come in two formats. The first highlights words or sentences (from the first page: "Her hair was yellow and her face was yellow . . . ."), and then explains them in sidebars on the same page ("Mary's yellow coloring is possibly a racialized representation, in which whiteness was reserved for native-born English children . . . ."). Other notes are mini-essays, indented within the text itself; the paragraph about Mary being found alone in India compares her to other orphans in children's literature and analyzes Burnett's use of Mary's selfishness. The inserted paragraphs seemed distracting; the sidebars did not. The art pieces, beautifully reproduced, were created by eight United States artists and four from Canada, India, Germany, and England. They cover wide-ranging subjects. Some pictures are easy to understand: a photo of a blossom-bedecked, modern wheelchair; flower pictures that look like botanical text...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».