Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Editor's Report for 2023 Nelson H. Minnich, Editor Ever since 1960, when he was appointed associate editor of the Catholic Historical Review, Msgr. Robert F. Trisco has been a towering figure at the journal. He was promoted to editor in 1963, a position he held until 2005 when he resigned that position to become once again associate editor with responsibilities for the book review and periodical literature sections of the journal. He was working on the periodical literature section of the Summer issue when he suddenly died at the end of July. His dedication to the journal was legendary. He insisted on publishing only serious scholarship properly formatted. He encouraged younger scholars and helped them to improve their articles. His eagle eye spotted misspelled foreign words or faulty punctuation. He took pride in an issue that was free of any errors. When difficulties arose, one could count on his sage advice. The debt owed to him by the journal is immense and his ever helpful, steady presence is much missed. May he rest from his labors in the joyful presence of the Lord he so faithfully served. Volume 109 of the journal consisted of 868 pages of articles, essays, fora, book reviews, miscellany, the quarterly sections Notes and Comments, Periodical Literature, and Other Books Received, and finally an Index, with an additional twenty-six pages of preliminary materials. In all, volume 109 contained 894 pages. Subsidies from authors and contributions from others made directly to the journal allowed for the addition of pages above those budgeted. Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York (honoring the memory of Msgr. Robert F. Trisco) and Professor Paul F. Grendler of Chapel Hill, NC (emeritus of the University of Toronto) have made generous contributions to the journal. Of the twelve regular articles published, excluding the ACHA Presidential Address of Brenna Moore and the "Journey in Church History" essay of Paul F. Grendler, one article treated a medieval topic, four an early modern European, four a late modern European, one an American, and three a Latin American theme. Nine of their authors came from American institutions, the others from German (1), Italian/Austrian (1), and Belgian/Peruvian (1) institutions. The volume also included an "In memoriam" tribute to Msgr. Robert F. Trisco and the transcription of the homily/eulogy given at his funeral by Cardinal Timothy Dolan. There were also three Forum Review Essays on books treating late modern, American, and Latin American topics, plus a Review Essay on the recent publications of Guillaume Cuchet. This volume featured the initial Digital Scholarship in the Field of Church History essay. Scholars assessed the contribution of various digital databases. We hope such essays will be a regular addition to the journal. [End Page 224] In 2023, the journal published 146 book reviews. The book reviews can be subdivided into the following categories: general (15), ancient (7), medieval (39), early modern (33), late modern (21), American (17), Latin American (8), Asian/Pacific (4), and African (2). Their authors came mostly from institutions in the United States (100 or 68%); England (13 or 8%); 4 or 3% each for Canada, Italy, and The Netherlands; 3 or 2% for Germany; 2 or 1.4% each for Israel, Poland, Vatican City, and Wales; one or .07% each for Austria, Finland, France, Japan, Malta, Mexico, Philippines, Scotland, South Africa, Turkey. Please see Table 1. Click for larger view View full resolution Table 1. Book Reviews Published in 2023 Because of the Covid-19 epidemic and Msgr. Trisco's declining health, over 300 books piled up awaiting a reviewer. Because it is difficut to find reviewers for older books, they were put aside, listed in the Other Books Received section, and donated to Mullen Library. The Autumn issue lists many of them. With the death of Msgr.Trisco, the Book Review team expanded so that those in charge of the various fieds are now: ancient Robin Darling Young, medieval Jennifer Paxton, early modern Nelson H. Minnich, late modern Arpad von Klimo, American Seth Smith, and Latin American Julia Young. To process better the book reviews, the journal now uses the Scholastica program. Ms. Julia Sedlack managed it in the Spring term, and Marirose...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».