The Pentateuch: Genesis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The PentateuchGenesis Michael W. Duggan, Thomas Hieke, Christopher T. Begg, Fred W. Guyette, William J. Urbrock, and Juliane Eckstein Michael W. Duggan Calgary AB, Canada Thomas Hieke Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz Christopher T. Begg Catholic University of America Fred W. Guyette Erskine College and Seminary, Anderson University William J. Urbrock University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh Juliane Eckstein Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz 2090. [Biblical Law and the Relationship between Law and Religion] Assnat Bartor, "Biblical Law: A Successful Relationship between Law and Religion," Ve-ʾEd Yaʿaleh (Gen 2:6), Vol. 1, 433-49 [see #2545]. Whereas all other traditions of the ANE identify kings of those nations as lawmakers, the Hebrew Scriptures are unique insofar as they present God as the author of the laws. B. traces the theological and social implications of law as the central factor in God's relationship to humans throughout the Torah. The trespassing of divine commandments by Adam, Eve, and Cain constitutes the subject matter of God's initial dialogues with humans (Gen 2:16-17; cf. 3:9-19; 4:9-16). God's interactions with Noah and Abraham set divine laws within a covenantal setting (9:4-6, 8-11; 17:2-8, 9-14). The centrality of laws becomes manifest in the covenant at Sinai which centers on the Decalogue and the Book of the Covenant (Exod 20:1-17; 20:22–23:33). Here, the emphasis moves from God's initiatives to human responsibility, which is worked out within dynamics of an I-You dialogue between the covenantal parties (cf. 22:21-24). Divine presence in judicial decision-making is the premise that makes casuistic laws components of common law in the Torah (18:15, 19; cf. Deut 19:17). These laws often exhibit discerning awareness regarding human behavior (see, e.g., Deut 12:29-31; 24:10-15).—M.W.D. [End Page 776] Google Scholar 2091. [Animal Family Laws in the Pentateuch] Beth A. Berkowitz, "Interpretation in the Anthropocene: Reading the Animal Family Laws of the Pentateuch," Mark W. Elliott, Raleigh C. Heth, and Angela Zautcke (eds.), Studies in the History of Exegesis (History of Biblical Exegesis 2; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2022) 39-51. B. focuses on the "animal family laws" in the Pentateuch (Exod 23:19; 34:26; Deut 14:21; Exod 22:29; Lev 22:27–28) and wants to find a somewhat more satisfying way to talk about these laws than the humanitarian rationale offers. B. begins with exegetical observations about Lev 22:27-28. Then she turns to ancient Jewish readings from Qumran (the Temple Scroll, 11QT col. 52) and highlights the Temple Scroll's permutations and related issues in 4QMMT (B 30-33). Further technical questions are raised by the rabbis in Sifra, the legal midrash on Leviticus. Next, B. examines the reception and interpretation of the biblical passage in the Mishnah and beyond (m. Hullin 5:1-3; m. Bekhorot 7:7; Philo, On the Virtues; Josephus, Antiquities 3:236-237). She concludes that the ancient texts address the sort of discursive formation that the family represents within these animal family laws. These biblical laws suggest considering animal family bonds as belonging to the genealogy of the family and the politics and traumas associated with it.—T.H. Google Scholar 2092. [The Symbolic and Prescriptive Functions of the Torah] John J. Collins, "The Torah in Its Symbolic and Prescriptive Functions," HeBAI 11 (1, 2022) 3-18. The Law of Moses was a pillar of common Judaism from the time of Ezra onwards, and was recognized as the most authoritative formulation of the ancestral laws of the Judeans. Even in this period, however, the Torah's authority could be construed in various ways. In many cases, observance of the Torah was tantamount to practice of some key observances (Sabbath, circumcision, the festivals, and the Temple cult) that stood metonymically for a whole way of life. In other cases, especially after the Maccabean revolt, zealous adherents of the Law insisted on observance even of minute details. Minute observance led to conflicting interpretations and to the rise of sectarianism. Even...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».