History and Geography
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
History and Geography Michael W. Duggan, Christopher T. Begg, William J. Urbrock, and Fred W. Guyette Michael W. Duggan Calgary AB, Canada Christopher T. Begg Catholic University of America William J. Urbrock University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh Fred W. Guyette Erskine College and Seminary, Anderson University 2064. [Ishmael as Ancestor of Western Nomads] Yairah Amit, "Ishmael: Father of Western Nomads," Ve-ʾEd Yaʿaleh (Gen 2:6), Vol. 1, 415-31 [see #2545]. A.'s examination of the geographical locations associated with Ishmael throughout the Abraham cycle (Gen 11:27–25:18) discloses that Ishmael and his descendants are identified with the nomads who inhabited the region south and west of Israel. They controlled [End Page 767] the oases from the southwestern Negev up to the border with Egypt whereas the sons whom Abraham begot by Keturah were nomads in the desert regions to the east (Gen 25:4-6). A. posits that the Genesis profile of Ishmael reflects the situation of Yehud under the leadership of Nehemiah in the fifth cent. b.c.e. With the destruction of Judah, Moab, and Edom in the sixth cent. b.c.e., multiple nomadic tribes infiltrated the above region (Jer 25:23-25; Isa 21:13-17; 60:6-7). Writing in the 5th cent. b.c.e., Herodotus describes nomadic Arabs in the west guiding the armies of Cambyses to water in the desert regions, thereby enabling the Persians to secure the territory up to the Lower Egyptian frontier (Herodotus, Hist. 3.9, 88, 91). A. views the biblical portrait of Ishmael as a representation of a nomadic chieftain who was allied with Nehemiah's administration in Jerusalem and who controlled the southwestern Negev under the aegis of the Achaemenid authorities (cf. Gen 16:12). See also #2110.—M.W.D. Google Scholar 2065. [The Samaritans] Maria del Socorro Bercerra Molina, HMSP, "Los samaritanos, un puebla que espera," Qol 88 (2022) 63-92. In her article, the author discusses the history of the Samaritans and their relationship with the Jews in the biblical period, noting the different conceptions about that relationship that can be distinguished, and the moment at which the distinction between the two groups began to emerge, a point which remains without a clear answer until today. In any case, the division between Jews and Samaritans is evident in the intertestamental period during which the two groups engaged in mutual polemics, a state of affairs which finds expression in the NT as well. At the same time, it has to be kept in mind that the two communities shared a common religious basis, which, however, they understood differently in some instances. The article concludes with a brief comparison of the conceptions and practices of the Jews and Samaritans in a chart format. [Adapted from published abstract—C.T.B.] Google Scholar 2066. [The Life of the Golah in the Babylonian Countryside in the 6th Century b.c.e.] Angelika Berlejung, "A Sketch of the Life of the Golah in the Countryside of Babylonia. Risks and Options of Involuntary Resettlement in the Sixth Century B.C.E," HeBAI 11 (Suppl., 2022) 148-88. My essay seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of the Babylonian deportation and resettlement policy in the 6th cent. b.c.e. To that end I sketch the risks and opportunities for the displaced and resettled people in the Babylonian countryside, the role of the Babylonian host population, and the government-sponsored development policy and risk management. The focus of my contribution concerns the intermediaries between the Babylonian (and Persian) royal administration and the low-profile captives in the countryside who used the chances offered them to start individual careers. As part of a new approach to the topic, I explore the extra-biblical textual material from Babylonia with methods drawn from social behavior studies and environmental anthropology, which have generated various new theories about forced migration and involuntary resettlement. This new methodological approach regarding the Babylonian deportees helps clarify the relevant terminology and sheds additional light on the aim and impact of forced displacement and involuntary resettlement in the Neo-Babylonian and Persian empires, as well as on...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».