Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: implications for anaesthesia
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Learning objectivesBy reading this article, you should be able to:•Describe the epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).•Discuss the diagnostic work-up of patients in whom a diagnosis of HFpEF is suspected.•Outline the pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of HFpEF.•Summarise the perioperative considerations in patients with HFpEF undergoing major surgery.•Safely manage patients taking sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the perioperative period.Key points•The numbers of patients with HFpEF presenting for surgery are likely to increase.•Diagnosing HFpEF relies on the presence of clinical signs and symptoms, and echocardiographic evidence of preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function and increased LV filling pressures.•First-line management of HFpEF includes sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, diuretics and treatment of coexisting comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. Atrial fibrillation should be managed aggressively.•SGLT2 inhibitors should be stopped 2–3 days before elective surgery to minimise the risk of developing euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis in the perioperative period. By reading this article, you should be able to:•Describe the epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).•Discuss the diagnostic work-up of patients in whom a diagnosis of HFpEF is suspected.•Outline the pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of HFpEF.•Summarise the perioperative considerations in patients with HFpEF undergoing major surgery.•Safely manage patients taking sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in the perioperative period. •The numbers of patients with HFpEF presenting for surgery are likely to increase.•Diagnosing HFpEF relies on the presence of clinical signs and symptoms, and echocardiographic evidence of preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function and increased LV filling pressures.•First-line management of HFpEF includes sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, diuretics and treatment of coexisting comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. Atrial fibrillation should be managed aggressively.•SGLT2 inhibitors should be stopped 2–3 days before elective surgery to minimise the risk of developing euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis in the perioperative period. Globally, >60 million people are estimated to have heart failure (HF), of which heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for 50% of cases.1Savarese G. Becher P.M. Lund L.H. et al.Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.Cardiovasc Res. 2023; 118: 3272-3287Google Scholar The prevalence of HFpEF is steadily increasing because of improved recognition, an ageing population and reduction in death from comorbidities that can lead to HFpEF. This review provides an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management and perioperative considerations for patients with HFpEF. Previous definitions of HF were largely arbitrary and lacked standardisation. In 2021, various cardiology societies developed a universal definition and classification system for HF (Fig. 1) designed to be clinically relevant with prognostic and therapeutic validity, applicable globally and allow standardisation of endpoints in research.2Bozkurt B. Coats A.J.S. Tsutsui H. et al.Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the heart failure society of America, heart failure association of the European society of cardiology, Japanese heart failure society and writing committee of the universal definition of heart failure: endorsed by the Canadian heart failure society, heart failure association of India, cardiac society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese heart failure association.Eur J Heart Fail. 2021; 23: 352-380Google Scholar The definition describes HF as a clinical syndrome with current or prior:(i)Symptoms, signs, or both caused by a structural or functional cardiac abnormality(ii)Corroborated by at least one of the following: (a) increased natriuretic peptide concentrations, (b) objective evidence of cardiogenic pulmonary or systemic congestion through imaging (echocardiography) or haemodynamic measurement (e.g. right heart catheterisation) at rest or exercise. Other syndromes may also fulfil this definition of HF. Examples include right HF (the commonest cause of which is left HF), cardiogenic shock, acute coronary syndrome, congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, high-output failure and hypertensive crises. Management should be guided towards treating the underlying cause and treating the symptoms of HF. Current global patterns demonstrate that whilst the incidence of HF has stabilised and is possibly declining in industrialised nations, the prevalence is increasing because of an ageing population and improvements in medical care.1Savarese G. Becher P.M. Lund L.H. et al.Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.Cardiovasc Res. 2023; 118: 3272-3287Google Scholar In a UK population-based study of 4 million individuals between 2002 and 2014, the incidence of HF decreased by 7% (from 358 to 332 per 100,000 person-years) but the absolute number of people diagnosed with HF increased by 12%.3Conrad N. Judge A. Tran J. et al.Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals.Lancet. 2018; 391: 572-580Google Scholar The prevalence remained stable between 1.5% and 1.6% but the absolute number increased by 23%. Socioeconomically deprived people were more likely to develop HF compared with affluent people and did so earlier in life.3Conrad N. Judge A. Tran J. et al.Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals.Lancet. 2018; 391: 572-580Google Scholar These data are consistent with a meta-analysis of >6 million individuals which found that low socioeconomic status was associated with an increased risk of incident HF ranging between 43% and 87%.4Potter E.L. Hopper I. Sen J. et al.Impact of socioeconomic status on incident heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019; 5: 169-179Google Scholar Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction now accounts for 50% of cases of HF.5Redfield M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google Scholar One large, multicohort study demonstrated an increase in the incidence of HFpEF from 4.7 to 6.8 per 1000 person-years over two decades.6Tsao C.W. Lyass A. Enserro D. et al.Temporal trends in the incidence of and mortality associated with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2018; 6: 678-685Google Scholar Risk factors for developing HFpEF include increasing age, hypertension, obesity, diabetes and previous myocardial infarction.7Ho J.E. Enserro D. Brouwers F.P. et al.Predicting heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: the International Collaboration on Heart Failure Subtypes.Circ Heart Fail. 2016; 9e003116Google Scholar Several pathophysiological pathways have been proposed, and a detailed review can be found elsewhere.8Gevaert A.B. Boen J.R.A. Segers V.F. et al.Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review of cardiac and noncardiac pathophysiology.Front Physiol. 2019; 10: 638Google Scholar,9Shah S.J. Borlaug B.A. Kitzman D.W. et al.Research priorities for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: national Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group summary.Circulation. 2020; 141: 1001-1026Google Scholar The historical model is one of hypertension with a hypertensive heart developing diastolic dysfunction (DD) with systolic dysfunction then developing over time. Treatment of hypertension has been shown to reduce incidence of HFpEF by 40% over 2–8 yrs.10Sciarretta S. Palano F. Tocci G. et al.Antihypertensive treatment and development of heart failure in hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of studies in patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk.Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 384-394Google Scholar Differences exists in the pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) function between HFpEF and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is associated with impaired ventricular relaxation, increased stiffness and increased filling pressures with pressure overload, whereas in HFrEF, the left ventricle undergoes eccentric remodelling resulting in chamber dilatation with volume overload.5Redfield M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google Scholar,8Gevaert A.B. Boen J.R.A. Segers V.F. et al.Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review of cardiac and noncardiac pathophysiology.Front Physiol. 2019; 10: 638Google Scholar Recent data suggest a proinflammatory state induced by comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease which cause systemic microvascular endothelial inflammation with downstream myocardial inflammation, increased oxidative stress and deregulation of nitric oxide signalling, fibrosis and hypertrophy.5Redfield M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google Scholar,11Paulus W.J. Zile M.R. From systemic inflammation to myocardial fibrosis: the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction paradigm revisited.Circ Res. 2021; 128: 1451-1467Google Scholar Interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations are commonly increased in HFpEF and are associated with greater symptom severity, poor exercise capacity and increased upper body fat composition.12Alogna A. Koepp K.E. Sabbah M. et al.Interleukin-6 in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2023; 11: 1549-1561Google Scholar Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend a simplified, pragmatic approach which should include the following:13McDonagh T.A. Metra M. Adamo M. et al.2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 3599-3726Google Scholar(i)The presence of symptoms and signs of HF(ii)LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%(iii)Exclusion of other pathologies that can mimic HFpEF(iv)Evidence of increased LV filling pressures/DD/increased left atrial volume and raised natriuretic peptides Approximately two thirds of patients with HFpEF present with dyspnoea and clinical signs of congestion such as peripheral oedema, raised jugular venous pressure and ascites.5Redfield M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google Scholar Those with unexplained dyspnoea without evidence of congestion require further diagnostic testing. As outlined above, patients diagnosed with HFpEF often have other comorbidities such as pulmonary disease, anaemia and atrial fibrillation which should be investigated and managed accordingly.14Forsyth F. Brimicombe J. Cheriyan J. et al.Characteristics of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis.BJGP Open. 2021; 5 (BJGPO.2021.0094)Google Scholar,15Mohammed S.F. Borlaug B.A. Roger V.L. et al.Comorbidity and ventricular and vascular structure and function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study.Circ Heart Fail. 2012; 5: 710-719Google Scholar Differential diagnoses of cardiac origin can be split into those affecting the myocardium and those that affect loading conditions. Conditions affecting the myocardium include coronary artery disease, either epicardial or microvascular. Infiltrative cardiomyopathies include amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hypertrophic and storage diseases such as haemochromatosis. Loading conditions include hypertensive disease, left-sided valvular disease, pericardial disease, arrhythmias and conditions leading to a high-output state. Differential diagnoses for HFpEF include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, amyloid cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, constrictive pericarditis and coronary artery disease.5Redfield M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google Scholar In cases of diagnostic uncertainty or unexplained dyspnoea, various algorithms have been proposed. Pieske and colleagues propose a stepwise HFA-PEFF algorithm which uses four steps (Fig. 2).16Pieske B. Tschope C. de Boer R.A. et al.How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).Eur J Heart Fail. 2020; 22: 391-412Google Scholar The H2PEF score is also recommended by guidelines to estimate likelihood of HFpEF in unexplained dyspnoea (Table 1).17Reddy Y.N.V. Carter R.E. Obokata M. et al.A simple, evidence-based approach to help guide diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Circulation. 2018; 138: 861-870Google Scholar,18Heidenreich P.A. Bozkurt B. Aguilar D. et al.2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.Circulation. 2022; 145: e895-e1032Google Scholar In areas of high disease prevalence, a score of ≥6 is associated with >95% probability of HFpEF whereas a score of 0–1 was associated with <25% probability of having HFpEF.17Reddy Y.N.V. Carter R.E. Obokata M. et al.A simple, evidence-based approach to help guide diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Circulation. 2018; 138: 861-870Google ScholarTable 1H2PEF score to assess risk of HFpEF in unexplained dyspnoea.Clinical variablePointsHeavy (BMI >30 kg m−2)2Hypertensive (>2 antihypertensive medications)1Fibrillation, atrial (any history)3Pulmonary hypertension (rest RVSP >35 mmHg)1Elderly (age >60 yrs)1Filling pressure (E/e’>9)1Score0–1HFpEF ruled out2–5Consider rest/stress RHC or stress echo6–9HFpEF ruled inBMI, body mass of diastolic to right heart right ventricular systolic in a body mass of diastolic to right heart right ventricular systolic natriuretic peptide and of the are by of the a in is by high LV which is to studies have demonstrated that concentrations have a high for HF in acute or and or T.A. Metra M. Adamo M. et al.2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 3599-3726Google Scholar in can stress and natriuretic peptide concentrations can be to of patients with HFpEF diagnosed by have concentrations the diagnostic B. Tschope C. de Boer R.A. et al.How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).Eur J Heart Fail. 2020; 22: 391-412Google Scholar associated with concentrations in patients with HFpEF are age, obesity, presence of or both and is in peptides to HFpEF in M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google et clinical and associated with natriuretic peptide concentrations in heart failure with preserved ejection J 2012; Scholar dysfunction is an of HFpEF but for the of should be that diastolic function as a of ventricular to a of ventricular and an increase in chamber Risk factors for developing include hypertension, coronary artery disease, increasing age, and dysfunction in and 2016; Scholar As can of stress myocardial function is (e.g. overload, hypertension, atrial signs and symptoms include those of on is from the American Society of S.F. et for the of left ventricular diastolic function by an update from the American Society of and the European Association of 2016; Scholar clinical considerations for are heart and pressure and The echocardiographic should be in to LV and ejection of left atrial volume and function should also be The that are to are in the and include the at the of the at the and Other include left atrial volume and and the of a The presence or of is on the four and or volume dysfunction is present more of the are management of HFpEF includes sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, diuretics for and treatment of other cardiovascular and are or both that a is or from the updated ESC T.A. Metra M. Adamo M. et of the ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart Heart J. 2023; Scholar cotransporter type 2 inhibitors are for diabetes and by the which of in the kidney which in Examples include and a of is recommended in HF. Several of of the of inhibitors have been proposed. cotransporter type 2 inhibitors increase concentrations, which an for the cardiac and S. so 2016; S. S. a in the in the 2016; Scholar These also have and have demonstrated myocardial a cardiac fibrosis by the in Med. Scholar Other include improved pressure reduction in and decreased oxidative detailed review of can be found S. of cardiovascular of 2 (SGLT2) a 2020; 5: Scholar of data from found that inhibitors reduced death for HF risk cardiovascular death for HF and mortality S. et in heart failure and of from 2022; Scholar These for of were also in patients with HFpEF or cotransporter type 2 inhibitors are in patients with a of diabetic ketoacidosis type diabetes, or estimated in and are inhibitors are with data increased risk of compared with M. et inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 2022; Scholar management of inhibitors is outlined in such as or are in patients with clinical of and have but current evidence demonstrate of one over H. S. A. et and of in heart failure a systematic review of Scholar studies that for HFrEF, such as inhibitors, inhibitors largely in patients with et al.How to manage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: for Heart Fail. 2023; 11: Scholar more data the of in patients are on inhibitors, and the may be M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google (e.g. increased >30 (e.g. for for increased risk factors for HF (e.g. peptide (e.g. are recommended for the management of type 2 diabetes and of include and the high prevalence of comorbidities in patients with pharmacological reduction of be the of or in patients with HFpEF and kg and found that treatment was associated with symptoms, greater and in exercise Borlaug B.A. et in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and J Med. 2023; Scholar exercise cardiac and have been shown to lead to improvements in exercise and of H. et of exercise on cardiac exercise and of in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of 2019; et in patients with acute heart failure with preserved reduced ejection fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2021; D.W. et of or exercise on and of in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a clinical 2016; Scholar with HFpEF have those with at but may also the from cardiac et in patients with acute heart failure with preserved reduced ejection fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2021; Scholar patients with HFpEF and obesity, through to reduction in by per can in and functional in of D.W. et of or exercise on and of in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a clinical 2016; Scholar to heart is in patients with HFpEF and associated with poor exercise studies have the of heart with on exercise with In the Atrial in Heart Failure of a to increase heart did exercise capacity and was associated with increased Y.N.V. Koepp K.E. Carter et atrial for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the clinical 2023; 329: Scholar the study was and high of from and a In the patients with HFpEF and for ventricular and to either a heart or remained at M. J. et of on of and atrial fibrillation in patients with and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the clinical 2023; Scholar Treatment with the algorithm was associated with improvements in of concentrations, and atrial The HFpEF study is the of heart and without with a chamber the and the of on of concentrations and in patients with HFpEF. the of cardiac in patients with HFpEF with HFpEF high of and mortality In one study patients with (e.g. acute coronary syndrome, in and (e.g. in mortality was and was of perioperative in heart failure patients with reduced preserved ejection fraction noncardiac 2022; Scholar capacity should be and objective cardiology and is with HFpEF often have other comorbidities (Table and should be is the management of inhibitors (Fig. of coexisting comorbidities in patients with to guidelines and artery in patients with increased for diabetes and manage kidney for and exercise and treatment for and for low obstructive systolic sodium-glucose cotransporter type in a low obstructive systolic sodium-glucose cotransporter type The of are to and the likely and to in the perioperative in to with of major associated with and the from to and In patients with HFpEF is of of the heart to filling in is in patients with because of diastolic filling time. increase in left atrial pressure is to the pulmonary and the pulmonary leading to increased of into the Atrial fibrillation is and can be for two has a to cause but is also the of atrial In HFpEF the atrial is more in ventricular filling In ventricular filling with contribution from the atrial or This can be in the is as is because the ventricle has been by the filling or with HFpEF are more to in volume This is often as having require an pressure to diastolic filling with a high left atrial pressure but so can and have an increase in left atrial pressure the volume status include system and of the with or can lead to The of chronic that affect vascular and status such as antihypertensive (e.g. and can can also have a on cardiac and should be induced in a and pressure and may be on the of the The of should be reduced and of may be because of a time. are data on the of on diastolic study the of and in diastolic function both in and those with of is reduced by the and This can lead to a reduction in chamber to be by such as and of and pressures are recommended to acute in pulmonary of is often an acute increase in which can and atrial may also be a of to the with the of The heart may this and acute HF. for euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis is recommended (Fig. diabetic ketoacidosis is likely to be because of this is likely to in patients with diabetes cases in patients without underlying diabetes have been M. M. inhibitors in is a perioperative risk of euglycaemic J Scholar risk factors include acute of to diabetes reduced or and reduced N. D. diabetic ketoacidosis associated with sodium-glucose a systematic J 2019; Scholar cotransporter type 2 inhibitors can be surgery as as patients are able to and and are In those develop inhibitors should be and by the diabetes Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is associated with poor of and clinical compared with patients with M.M. Borlaug B.A. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review.JAMA. 2023; 329: 827-838Google et in patients with acute heart failure with preserved reduced ejection fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2021; Scholar mortality from to and mortality from to Roger V.L. M.M. of heart failure with preserved ejection Scholar a for are and mortality from to Roger V.L. M.M. of heart failure with preserved ejection Scholar are the primary cause of death in HFpEF and of death a of in HFpEF compared with M. A. et of death in heart failure with preserved ejection Scholar into the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of HFpEF have been over the Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is and for and prognostic is an of S.J. Borlaug B.A. Kitzman D.W. et al.Research priorities for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: national Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group summary.Circulation. 2020; 141: 1001-1026Google Scholar studies may help in this HFpEF and of the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Scholar Recent data also the that HFpEF is a state and further is into the and of (e.g. in HFpEF. current epidemiology data are from and America, and data from other are from The that have of to and and and for the the perioperative management of inhibitors and The associated be at by to is an clinical at the of and a in is an in perioperative is also is an of is a with a in cardiovascular also has an in myocardial in dyspnoea, and is the of the Cardiology is a in and and lead for at has Society of in
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle