MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392525124 · doi:10.1353/ota.2023.a914515

Major Prophets

2023· article· en· W4392525124 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fred W. Guyette, Christopher T. Begg, Thomas Hieke, Juliane Eckstein, Brian J. Meldrum, Richard A. Taylor

Notice bibliographique

RevueOld Testament abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIslamic Studies and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Major Prophets Fred W. Guyette, Christopher T. Begg, Thomas Hieke, Juliane Eckstein, Brian J. Meldrum, and Richard A. Taylor Fred W. Guyette Erskine College and Seminary, Anderson University Christopher T. Begg Catholic University of America Thomas Hieke Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz Juliane Eckstein Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz Brian J. Meldrum Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit Richard A. Taylor Dallas Theological Seminary 2338. [OT Prophets' Uniforms] Gregory Goswell, "The Uniform of the Old Testament Prophet," Toronto Journal of Theology 38 (1, 2022) 25-36. This study of Elijah's clothing concludes that when clothes are specified in OT narrative, it adds to the characterization of the wearer and serves as a prop for the wearer's action. It cannot be proved that every prophet dressed after the fashion of Elijah, but after Elijah more than one prophet wore "a hairy mantle" (Zech 13:4). This mode of dress is best explained as a link to wilderness traditions and appears to express support for the religious orthodoxy of the faith proclaimed by Moses. For more on these themes, see O. Prouser, "Suited to the Throne: The Symbolic Use of Clothing in the David and Saul Narratives," JSOT 71 (1996) 27-37, and V. Matthews, "The Anthropology of Clothing in the Joseph Narrative," JSOT 65 (1995) 25-36.—F.W.G. Google Scholar 2339. [The Cessation of Prophecy and Its Role in the Process of Re-reading] Herve Tremblay, "Quel rôle la cessation du prophétisme biblique aurait-elle joué dans le processus de relecture?," In Memoriam Francolino Gonçalves, O.P. 1943–2017, 49-68 [see #2540]. Francolino Gonçalves traveled from Portugal to Ottawa in the fall of 1966. We were both young scholars at that point in time. In memorable private conversations, we shared our developing thoughts about the ongoing process of reinterpreting the prophets. Many years later (1999), we had an opportunity to reopen that friendly conversation, and that became the catalyst for the essay I offer here. A study by L. Stephen Cook, On the Question of the Cessation of Prophecy in Ancient Judaism (2011) raises an important question: Who was the last prophet? Among the rabbis, that prophet was sometimes identified as Jeremiah, who witnessed the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. After that catastrophic event, God's holy spirit left Jerusalem. Wasn't it last seen accompanying the long line of exiles heading toward Babylon? Or maybe we could spin that question in another way. Who does a prophet speak to so as to warn the nation of God's impending judgment? A prophet speaks to a king. No king on the throne of Israel? Well, then, no prophecy either! [End Page 859] But perhaps the rabbis of the Diaspora have been more comfortable giving a less dramatic answer: That is simply one of the differences that can be noticed between the First Temple and the Second Temple. There were many prophets during the time of the First Temple, but no prophets during the time of the Second Temple. For Christians, the canonical answer to the question about the last prophet is: Malachi. But prophecy was not dead—it was simply dormant until God's spirit inspired John the Baptist to preach his fiery message of repentance. John the Baptist was not afraid to speak of God's statutes before kings, was he? We might even say that John was following Ps 119:46 when he confronted Herod about his sins. Do Christians affirm that Christ was the last prophet? That is the question pursued in an essay by B. Viviano, "The Dogma of the Prophetless Time in Judaism: Does Prophecy Cease with Christ for Christians? Some Explorations," L'écrit et l'esprit (2005) 418-31. For yet another take on this question, see the essay by Joseph Blenkinsopp, "We Pay No Heed to Heavenly Voices: The 'End of Prophecy' and the Formation of the Canon," Biblical and Humane: A Festschrift for John F. Priest (1996) 19-31. Let's add one more voice to the debate and allow it to bring our reflection to a close for now. For the view that the earthly Jesus (Luke 4:16...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,401
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOld Testament abstractsMême sujetIslamic Studies and HistoryTravaux en français237 207