The effects of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug on the behavioural and physiological parameters of beef cows and calves assisted at calving
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be administered after an assisted calving to the cow or the calf as a pain mitigation strategy to combat the negative impacts of injury or trauma associated with a difficult calving. However, the effects of NSAIDs on beef cows’ and calves’ behaviour related to pain and cow-calf bonding after an assisted calving have not been studied. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of giving an NSAID to beef cattle after an assisted calving by measuring changes in behaviours associated with pain and cow-calf bonding, and physiological parameters associated with pain in beef cows and calves. Twenty-three cow-calf pairs assisted at calving were randomly allocated to two medication groups, meloxicam (Metacam®, 20 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/kg body weight, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) or placebo (0.025 ml/kg). Cow blood samples for serum haptoglobin concentration and thermal images of the vulva were taken at calving and 24±1 hours after calving. Calf blood samples for L-lactate concentration and thermal images of the head were taken at birth and blood samples for serum IgG concentration and thermal images were repeated at 24±1 hours after birth. After at-birth sample collection and treatment administration, the cow-calf pairs were placed in box stalls, and their behaviours were recorded for 24±1 hours. A human approach test and a separation test were performed after the 24±1 hour period. Descriptive statistics, multivariable linear and logistic regression models, and non-parametric tests were used to analyze the data. There were no significant differences between meloxicam and placebo groups for serum IgG concentration, haptoglobin concentration, or changes in temperature in the cows’ vulva or calves’ head. Additionally, there were no significant differences between meloxicam and placebo groups for the cows’ behaviours (i.e., time spent lying in sternal recumbency, standing, feeding, self-grooming, grooming the calf, and frequency of flicking her tail, raising her tail, and pressing against the box stall). Calves treated with meloxicam were more active (P = 0.04) and played more (P = 0.01) than placebo calves. No other behaviours (i.e., time spent lying in sternal recumbency, attempting to stand, standing, walking, being in a nursing position, investigating, and frequency of approaching the cow) were significantly different for calves treated with meloxicam compared to placebo calves. The use of meloxicam in calves after an assisted calving may indicate that the anti-inflammatory effects results in improved calf welfare in calves assisted at birth.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».