Global groundwater environmental flow violations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Groundwater serves as a vital resource to meet growing freshwater demands, particularly for the irrigation sector, driven by population growth and socioeconomic development. Apart from this application, however, groundwater also supports surface water bodies through groundwater discharge. While irrigation demands are important, environmentally safe levels of groundwater discharge must also be maintained.We applied two methods of calculating groundwater environmental flows using modelled groundwater discharge. The first, Presumptive Standard1, stipulates that 90% of naturally occurring groundwater discharge should be maintained. The second, Q902, considers the 90th percent exceedance from a 60-month moving window as the environmental flow. We then calculated violations when the human-impacted groundwater discharge, accounting for sectoral water use, dropped below the environmental flows.At the river basin scale, we assessed violation frequency and severity. Notably, despite Presumptive Standard violations occurring more frequently than Q90 violations, both methods identified the same spatial trends: basins in intensively irrigated regions experienced the most frequent and severe violations.Similarly, we assessed the frequency and severity of violations during low-flow periods, isolated using the Q90 as a low-flow threshold, when the role of groundwater to support surface water bodies increases. During these critical instances, the Presumptive Standard and Q90 estimated nearly identical violation schemes.The groundwater environmental flow violations were further compared to surface water environmental flow violations, following the methodology of Variable Monthly Flow3. This comparison highlighted the importance of including groundwater in environmental flow assessments, as many regions experience high levels of groundwater violations compared to surface water violations.In addition to frequency and severity, we assessed the timing of violations in select basins with high levels irrigated agriculture. Timing refers to the specific instances when violations occurred. This analysis showed the progression of violation trends over time and emphasized the driving force of groundwater abstractions on environmental flow violations.Our study shows that including groundwater in assessments of environmental flows is vital, as groundwater is a finite source which plays a crucial role in supporting surface water bodies. When conducting such an assessment, however, the selected groundwater environmental flow threshold may have an effect. If all timesteps are to be considered, the choice of methodology between the Presumptive Standard and Q90 will make a difference. If the focus is on low-flows, however, the choice of methodology will not greatly impact the assessment.1. Gleeson, T. & Richter, B. How much groundwater can we pump and protect environmental flows through time? Presumptive standards for conjunctive management of aquifers and rivers. River Res Appl 34, 83-92 (2018).2. de Graaf, I. E. M., Gleeson, T., (Rens) van Beek, L. P. H., Sutanudjaja, E. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping. Nature 574, 90-94 (2019).3. Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H. & Kabat, P. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18, 5041-5059 (2014).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».