Carbon Emissions from Active Horticulture Peat Extraction Sites in Canada: Five Years of Field-based Measurements
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Peat extraction substantially alters the carbon dynamics, peat structure, and hydrology of peatland sites. In Canada, companies install drainage ditches every ~30 m, dividing the sites into fields of peat bounded by ditches, and remove the surface vegetation and upper acrotelm. Peat is then vacuum harvested, processed, and sold for horticulture use. Despite this disturbance covering only a small percentage of Canadian peatlands, the shift from being a net sink to a net source of carbon during the 15-35 years of extraction makes them an important system to study.We conducted research at eight actively extracted peatland study sites in Quebec (Eastern Canada) and Alberta (Western Canada), ranging from 3–28 years post the start of extraction. Our objectives were to i) assess spatial distribution of CO2 and CH4 emissions; 2) assess seasonal and interannual variability of these emissions; and 3) understand their environmental drivers. To do this, we employed measurement techniques at the plot and ecosystem scale. Plot scale chamber-based measurements of CO2 and CH4 were conducted weekly to biweekly from May to September at eight sites from 2018 to 2022, with each site being measured in at least one study year. The drainage ditches were hotspots of carbon emissions with around double and at least seven times the CO2 and CH4 emissions respectively, of the fields. Time since the start of extraction was a useful metric to estimate current CO2 emissions when sites were within one bog complex. More research will be required to extrapolate emissions to other locations however, as peat substrate quality differences between locations also contributed to variation in carbon loss.Ecosystem scale measurements of daytime March to October CO2 and CH4 emissions were conducted at a subset of the study sites for two to three years using the eddy covariance technique. We observed comparable March and April CO2 emissions to those in July, highlighting the importance of thaw dynamics on the yearly carbon budget. Interannually, CO2 emissions were lowest during a dry summer, suggesting a moisture limitation for decomposition at the surface under severe drainage. We found weak dependence of CO2 emissions on soil temperature, though it was strongest when the water table was within the top 40 cm of the peat.This research will aid in validating Canada’s emission factor values for peat extraction, which are currently based on a few measurements in Quebec at post extracted, unrestored peatlands. Using several different assumptions for wintertime emissions, we estimated annual CO2 budget of 256 – 385 g C m-2 yr-1, which agrees with Canada’s current Tier 2 emission factor value of 310 g C m-2 yr-1. Methane emissions accounted for < 1 g C m-2 yr-1. This research will also support process-based models looking at the effect of site management, and the changing climate, on carbon emissions from these sites.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».