MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392614186 · doi:10.1353/wlt.2024.a920873

Editor's Note

2024· article· en· W4392614186 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Literature Today · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editor's Note Daniel Simon Click for larger view View full resolution Photo: Alba Simon The volcano is perhaps no longer just the symbol of social or warlike violence but the metaphor of a real ecological time bomb to come. —Charif Majdalani, "Dancing at the Foot of a Volcano" FOR MORE THAN A DECADE AND A HALF, World Literature Today has been taking the pulse, so to speak, of writers' responses to the planetary climate crisis. In special issues from 2008, 2011, 2014, and 2019, poets, essayists, and novelists, in dialogue with scientists, have been watching, with a mixture of incredulity and alarm, as the world seems to spin out of control around them. Watching, but also documenting the calamity and imagining futures both bleak and utopian. In WLT's latest survey of international climate lit, "Writing the Polycrisis," we lead with an essay by Richard Heinberg from the Post Carbon Institute (page 32). "So many new and serious threats are appearing, and so quickly," Heinberg writes, "that a word has come into currency to describe this unprecedented convergence of risk—polycrisis." And the stakes of polycrisis—what Heinberg calls the "scale of consequence"—have become increasingly incontestable. Heinberg clearly explains that the "risk/crisis generating machine" of fossil-fueled capitalism can't just be unplugged, however. Ultimately, he concludes, we have "become our own worst enemy," and "there may be no path forward that does not require a significant sacrifice of wealth, dominance, or comfort. … Collective survival will require setting aside our hubris and coming to terms with environmental and social limits." Heinberg sees some glimmer of hope in that humans are "smart, linguistic, ultrasocial, tool-making primates." Writers, as linguistic tool-making primates par excellence, have long held up a mirror to the natural world. Poets, in particular, draw on the aboriginal connection between the self and a sense of sacred connectedness to the land in a primary way. Philippine Canadian poet Rina Garcia Chua, writing in the aftermath of the wildfires and heat dome that ravaged the Pacific Northwest in 2022–2023, offers a poem suffused with grief—grief that sits at the bottom of her speaker's lungs, colors the dusk "spectral orange," is swallowed in her dreams, that "skids and writhes" against everything she touches. "I inhale a breath," she writes, "to resist the collapse of a chest./Some air to run with; some lips to sing with." In "Dead Horse Bay," Venezuelan poet Santiago Acosta catalogs the detritus of our throwaway culture in the liminal space of an island atop an old landfill jutting out into Brooklyn's Jamaica Bay. Three poems by Guaraní Argentine writers, translated by Whitney DeVos and Valeria Meiller, also take place in fragile ecotones; in Ana Gayoso's "Archaic," the "soul's force burns" in a landscape by turns Edenic and decimated. And in speculative fictions by Ghanaian writer Cheryl S. Ntumy and South African writer Vuyokazi Ngemntu, the respective female narrators manifest struggles for political and bodily sovereignty via environmental allegories, one utopian, the other dystopian. When WLT's editorial team first began discussing the idea of this issue, we envisioned a focus on the Global South, since that region bears the brunt of some of the worst effects of climate catastrophe. Yet however the Global South is defined, the geography and economics of the polycrisis know no borders. At the recently concluded United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28), the Joint Statement on Climate, Nature, and People—one of ten pledges in the final agreement of December 15, 2023—emphasized that "addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation together" must be done in "a coherent, synergetic, and holistic manner, in accordance with the best available science." In the face of overwhelming scientific evidence about the planetary scale of the crisis, synergies of culture and science can offer opportunities for understanding, emotional engagement, and perhaps a vision that promises something other than unrelenting despair. [End Page 3] Copyright © 2024 World Literature Today and the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,474
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWorld Literature TodayMême sujetEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureTravaux en français237 207