Libanoculex intermedius is not a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae): It is a chaoborid (Chaoboridae)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mosquitoes comprise a large and abundant group of extant species, the Culicidae, which occur throughout the world except in the Polar Regions, high mountains and isolated islands.All males and the females of many species feed exclusively on plant liquids.However, the females of most species feed on the blood of living animals, and many of those are the vectors of pathogens that cause various diseases in humans.Adult mosquitoes are slender, long-legged flies that are easily recognized by their long proboscis and the presence of scales on most parts of the body.Fossil mosquitoes are uncommon.Some are known from compression fossils and some are known from amber inclusions.Twenty-eight indisputable fossil mosquitoes have been formally described and named: Gilka et al. (2021) described the twenty-eighth species and provided an informative tabulation of the 27 previously known fossil species.Three of those species are representatives of three extinct genera that existed in the Upper Cretaceous Epoch of the Mesozoic Era.Twenty species of the extant genera Anopheles Meigen, 1818, Culex Linnaeus, 1758, Culiseta Felt, 1904, Coquillettidia Dyar, 1905 and Toxorhynchites Theobald, 1901a, and five species from three extinct genera, are known from the more recent Cenozoic Era.The discovery of the three Cretaceous species confirms the view of Edwards (1923) that the Culicidae probably evolved in the Mesozoic.The oldest fossil mosquitoes, Burmaculex antiquus Borkent & Grimaldi, 2016 (Burmaculicinae) and Priscoculex burmanicus Poinar, Zavortink & Brown, 2019 (Anophelinae) are embedded in Myanmar (Burmese) amber from the mid-Cretaceous (89.3-99.6Mya) 1 and Paleoculicis minutus Poinar, Zavortink, Pike & Johnston, 2000 is embedded in Canadian amber from the Upper Cretaceous, Campanian Age (72.1-83.6Mya).Burmaculex antiquus has the general appearance and body structure of extant mosquito species (and so do the other two oldest fossil species), which includes an elongated labium with enclosed stylet-like mouthparts.The legs of Burmaculex antiquus are covered with scales, but other areas, except for the costa and posterior margin of the wing, apparently lack scales.Priscoculex burmanicus, in addition to bearing a predominance of anopheline characters, e.g. the abdomen without scales, bears some unique features, including antennal flagellomeres with scales and wing veins with both slender scales and setae.Paleoculicis minutus is the next oldest fossil mosquito.Morphological features indicate that Paleoculicis minutus shares a closer affinity with culicine mosquitoes than it does with anopheline mosquitoes, which suggests that this ancestral lineage is younger than the lineage that gave rise to the subfamily Anophelinae.That aside, Priscoculex burmanicus, Anopheles dominicanus Zavortink & Poinar, 2000 and Anopheles?rottensis Statz, 1944 are the only other fossil anopheline mosquitoes.The age of Priscoculex burmanicus is noted above, Anopheles dominicanus is contained in Dominican amber from the Miocene (5.33-23.03Mya) and Anopheles?rottensis is from the Oligocene of Germany (23.03-33.9Mya).From the available fossil evidence, it appears that extant groups of the Culicidae evolved in the Cenozoic.Recently, a new distinctive fossil fly, Libanoculex intermedius Azar, Nel, Huang & Engel, 2023, was described as "the earliest known fossil mosquito" from two adult males embedded in Lebanese amber dated to the Barremian Age (125.0-129.4Mya) of the Lower Cretaceous.At a glance, the fly does not have the general appearance of a mosquito, with striking differences not in agreement with the current diagnosis of the Culicidae.Most notably, the overall construction of the mouthparts is unlike that of all "true" fossil and extant mosquito species.As taxonomists normally do when presented with an unknown organism, I ran Libanoculex intermedius through several identification keys.First, using the key of Carpenter & LaCasse (1955), which includes dixid and chaoborid 1 The ages provided for fossil taxa follow the geological timescale determined by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS).These ages generally differ slightly from those provided with the published descriptions of fossil mosquitoes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».