Integrating Multi-Sensor and Multi-Platform Technologies for Enhanced Assessment of Spectral Indices and Phenological Dynamics in a Seasonal Tropical Dry Forest
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Seasonal Tropical Dry Forest (STDF) known as Caatinga occupies approx. 10% of the Brazilian territory. Its vegetation exhibits rapid phenological responses to rainfall resulting in corresponding increases in gross primary productivity and biomass production. Determining the timing of the start and end of the growing season is very important to ecosystem studies and to precisely quantify the carbon balance. Satellite-derived vegetation indices have been widely used to capture the vegetation dynamics in response to fluctuating environmental conditions. However, the spatial and temporal resolution of these indices cannot capture fine vegetation features and phenology metrics in a highly biodiverse and heterogeneous environment such as the Caatinga. On the other hand, phenocameras have been successfully used for this particular purpose for tropical and dry ecosystems. Complementarily, proximal spectral response sensors (SRS) have been used to allow computation of vegetation indices as phenology proxies. Due to their ability to capture high spatial resolution imagery, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) or drones, can deliver an excellent spatial and a very good temporal resolution for diverse detailed vegetation studies. In this context, the objective of this study was to verify whether multi-sensor and multi-platform technologies provide an enhanced assessment of spectral indices and phenological dynamics of the Caatinga. The field campaign occurred in a pristine area of caatinga vegetation, located at the Legal Reserve of Caatinga, Embrapa Semi-Arid, Petrolina, Brazil. Indices for detecting phenology dynamics were obtained using multi-spectral cameras installed on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), field spectral response sensors (SRS), phenocameras (digital RGB cameras) and MODIS satellite data (visible and near infrared) from 2020 to 2023. Environmental driving data were measured via instrumentation installed on a flux tower. Standard statistical measures, including correlation coefficients were employed to verify the relationship observed on Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI), and Green Chromatic Coordinate (Gcc) determined by different sensors and platforms. We observed a substantial and fast increase in Gcc, NDVI and PRI immediately after rainfall events. The sensitivity of NDVI and PRI to changes in vegetation can vary depending on factors such as vegetation greenness, overall plant health, and stress responses according to the environmental conditions of the study area. Particularly during the dry season, indices derived from higher spatial resolution sensors consistently showed lower NDVI values compared to those obtained from proximal spectral response sensors (SRS) and drones. Our observations indicate that the representation of vegetation captured by satellites and drones aligns well with the data obtained from phenocamera and proximal SRS platforms. The combination of high temporal resolution provided by SRS and phenocameras resulted in improved and more reliable indices that will be indispensable for evaluating the response of Caatinga vegetation to current and future conditions.Funding: This study was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP (grants ##2015/50488-5, #2019/11835-2; #2021/10639-5; #2022/07735-5), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - CAPES (Finance Code 001), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (306563/2022-3).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».