MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4392648256 · doi:10.1353/hpn.2024.a921469

Blood Novels: Gender, Caste, and Race in Spanish Realism by Julia H Chang (review)

2024· article· en· W4392648256 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHispania · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHispanic-African Historical Relations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCasteRace (biology)RealismSociologyGender studiesAnthropologyArtLiteraturePhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Blood Novels: Gender, Caste, and Race in Spanish Realism by Julia H Chang Joan Hoffman Chang, Julia H Blood Novels: Gender, Caste, and Race in Spanish Realism. U of Toronto P, 2022. Pp. 207. ISBN 978-1-4875-4301-3. In Blood Novels: Gender, Caste, and Race in Spanish Realism, Julia H. Chang offers an innovative first-of-its-kind investigation of nineteenth-century male novelists' fascination with and anxiety about blood and its intersection with race, class, and gender. This "culturally situated analysis of blood—at once material and discursive—" considers the female protagonists of four of the most important male-authored works of Spanish realism: Doña Luz by Juan Valera, La Regenta by Leopoldo [End Page 163] Alas, and La desheredada and Fortunata y Jacinta: Dos historias de casadas by Benito Pérez Galdós in an investigation that is at once both broad and deep (xi). Thus, Chang examines the myriad manifestations of blood—both physical and figurative—in these novels: bleeding bodies and blood-filled hallucinations; bloodlines—both human and equine; kinship, limpieza de sangre and converso surnames; menstruation and childbirth; leeches, bloodletting, and hemorrhage; 'bad blood,' 'blue blood' and birthright; la voz de la sangre and the pueblo's sangre social; bloodcolored buildings; freshly butchered meat, and blood-spattered poultry shops. The author successfully engages with feminism; queer studies; fashion and color; hygiene, gynecology, pathology, psychology, and historical medical texts; race theory, whiteness; the image of the horse; cleanliness and filth; the linguistic connections apparent in the words casta/castidad and lujo/lujuria; crowd science; history, politics, La Gloriosa, and the Paris Commune; Sigmund Freud, Michel Foucault, José Ortega y Gasset, Eduardo López Bago, and others "to view [these iconic female protagonists] anew" through the novel lens of blood (3). "Anew," is not a trivial word in this wholly original study. Indeed, this volume is brimming with new insights and overlooked connections in these widely studied works. To her credit, the author herself recognizes and repeatedly calls attention to her own pioneering approach with such phrases as "a critical dimension … that had long been ignored" (x), "that had not been seriously assessed before" (x), "In a seldom remarked passage of the novel" (72), "less critical space has been afforded to" (94), "far less attention has been given to" (132), "I propose a different reading" (138), and "that (to my knowledge) have never been examined in the criticism" (150). Noteworthy among Chang's novel contributions to our understanding of these authors, works, and female protagonists is her coining of the term "chastity bind" (66). Used here in reference to Ana Ozores, it is defined as the societal compulsion that she remains chaste because she is female, while at the same time being considered impure and unclean because she bleeds every month; indeed, many literary women could be characterized accordingly, and I can imagine this will not be the last time this term is used in literary or cultural criticism. Also unique is Chang's reading of the Fortunata-Jacinta relationship as a case of "queering kinship," in which both women (one red-blooded and one blue-blooded) become the parents of Fortunata's son (128) as Juanito is dismissed as the child's father, and both the heteronormative patriarchal kinship model and the limpieza de sangre model are toppled (130). I do not believe this much-studied scene has been understood in quite this way until now. Truly, through close reading, astute analysis, and use of wide-ranging sources, Julia H. Chang has succeeded, with Blood Novels: Gender, Caste, and Race in Spanish Realism, in obliging us to view four much-loved and much-studied nineteenth-century novels anew, to notice their authors' obsession with gender, caste, race, and blood in all of its manifestations. This is an important contribution to Spanish literary, cultural, and gender studies that will surely influence future research. Joan Hoffman Western Washington University Copyright © 2024 AATSP

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,864
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle