Early warning meteorological fire danger over Central Europe
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Meteorological fire danger has been steadily increasing over Europe in the last decades, not only over the Mediterranean South that is recurrently affected by extreme fire weather and where the largest fire events take place, but also over Central, Eastern and Northern countries that are facing more and more events. The two most recent examples are the devastating fires in Rhodes and northern Greece in 2023, and those in France, Spain, Portugal, Slovenia and Czechia in 2022 when the total of burnt area almost reached the record value of 2017. The increase in severity of fire events is of major concern for all European countries, but special attention should be devoted to Central Europe where large fires, usually driven by the compound effect of droughts and heatwaves (e.g., 2018, 2022), are posing new challenges at the levels of fire management and fire forecasting.We present a statistical model of energy released by wildfires that allows calibrating the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) over three major land cover types (forest, shrub, and agriculture) covering an area encompassing Central Europe (3.5º-17ºE and 45º-62ºN). The model consists of a doubly truncated lognormal body distribution with generalized Pareto tails (DaCamara et al., 2023) that incorporates FWI as a covariate of its parameters. For each land cover type, the model is fitted to the set of observed values (from 2001 to 2022) of the logarithm of Fire Radiative Power associated to hotspots as detected by the MODIS instrument on-board Terra and Aqua platforms. For each model, goodness of fit is evaluated by using the Anderson-Darling test to assess the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis that the sample follows the distribution.The fitted models allow estimating for each land cover type the probability of exceedance of a predefined threshold of log(FRP) for each day and grid point. Five classes of fire danger (low, moderate, high, very high, and extreme) for each land cover type are then defined by analyzing the spatial and temporal variability of the distribution of pixels among classes as well as the distribution among classes of FRP associated to hotspots, such that classes of higher fire danger tend to concentrate in the fire season, and fires with high values of FRP occur in pixels classified in the classes of high, very high and extreme danger. The procedure is further validated by examining several case studies that were chosen because of unusually intense fire events or because of the high number of occurrences. This work was supported by EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis (LSA SAF) and by Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), a research unit financed with national funds (PIDDAC) by FCT (UIDB/50019/2020). References: DaCamara, C. C., Libonati, R., Nunes, S. A., de Zea Bermudez, P., & Pereira, J. M. C. (2023). Global-scale statistical modelling of the radiative power released by vegetation fires using a doubly truncated lognormal body distribution with generalized Pareto tails. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129049
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».