Exercise Testing and Artificial Intelligence as Allies in Improving the Detection and Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dehkordi et al,1Dehkordi N.R. Dehkordi N.R. Toudeshki K.K. Farjoo M.H. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of long QT syndrome: a review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024; 2: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.11.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar recently published an interesting review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives related to artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis of long QT syndrome (LQTS). As LQTS is at the center of our current research, we very much enjoyed this innovative and enlightening read. Recent articles suggest that AI exhibits superior diagnostic performance compared with expert clinicians, particularly excelling in identifying cases of dangerous, concealed LQTS.1Dehkordi N.R. Dehkordi N.R. Toudeshki K.K. Farjoo M.H. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of long QT syndrome: a review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024; 2: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.11.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar We must, however, remind the scientific community about the major link between LQTS and exercise testing,2Harvey A. Curnier D. Dodin P. Abadir S. Jacquemet V. Caru M. The influence of exercise and postural changes on ventricular repolarization in the long QT syndrome: a systematic scoping review.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022; 29: 1633-1677https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac081Crossref Scopus (4) Google Scholar which may act as an ally to AI in the battle to improve LQTS detection and diagnosis. The main issue in LQTS diagnosis is the significant overlap of the corrected QT interval (QTc) range between LQTS (≥470 ms for males; ≥480 ms for females) and healthy individuals, as measured by the electrocardiogram (ECG).3Chattha I.S. Sy R.W. Yee R. et al.Utility of the recovery electrocardiogram after exercise: a novel indicator for the diagnosis and genotyping of long QT syndrome?.Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7: 906-911https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.03.006Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar In fact, 25%-50% of LQTS patients have a resting QTc in the normal (<440 ms for males; <460 ms for females) or borderline (440-469 ms for males; 460-479 ms for females) range.4Sy R.W. van der Werf C. Chattha I.S. et al.Derivation and validation of a simple exercise-based algorithm for prediction of genetic testing in relatives of LQTS probands.Circulation. 2011; 124: 2187-2194https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.028258Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar Exercise testing has been recognized as a key aspect in the identification and evaluation of patients at risk of congenital LQTS, especially for those who present with a dangerous, concealed QT interval prolongation at rest.2Harvey A. Curnier D. Dodin P. Abadir S. Jacquemet V. Caru M. The influence of exercise and postural changes on ventricular repolarization in the long QT syndrome: a systematic scoping review.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022; 29: 1633-1677https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac081Crossref Scopus (4) Google Scholar Specifically, LQTS causes abnormal QTc prolongation during exercise and/or recovery.2Harvey A. Curnier D. Dodin P. Abadir S. Jacquemet V. Caru M. The influence of exercise and postural changes on ventricular repolarization in the long QT syndrome: a systematic scoping review.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022; 29: 1633-1677https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac081Crossref Scopus (4) Google Scholar Hence, the 1993-2011 Schwartz LQTS Diagnostic Criteria suggest the combination of resting and recovery QTc data to increase diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.5Schwartz P.J. Crotti L. QTc Behavior during exercise and genetic testing for the long-QT syndrome.Circulation. 2011; 124: 2181-2184https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.062182Crossref PubMed Scopus (250) Google Scholar Interestingly, studies have also identified a genotype-specific repolarization response to exercise. Thus, exercise testing may serve as a phenotypic enhancer of silent congenital LQTS.2Harvey A. Curnier D. Dodin P. Abadir S. Jacquemet V. Caru M. The influence of exercise and postural changes on ventricular repolarization in the long QT syndrome: a systematic scoping review.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022; 29: 1633-1677https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwac081Crossref Scopus (4) Google Scholar As described in the review, the potential of AI-driven analysis of ECG data to accurately identify and anticipate LQTS diagnosis and distinguish genetic subtypes is promising.1Dehkordi N.R. Dehkordi N.R. Toudeshki K.K. Farjoo M.H. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of long QT syndrome: a review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024; 2: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.11.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar However, the authors transparently discuss several important challenges, including uninterpretable AI decision-making processes and the potential misclassification of healthy controls as LQTS based on resting ECG values.1Dehkordi N.R. Dehkordi N.R. Toudeshki K.K. Farjoo M.H. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of long QT syndrome: a review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024; 2: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.11.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar Specifically, if resting ECG data is incorrect or not sufficiently robust, the AI model will lack power and, therefore, will be insufficient to make it a strong element of clinical diagnosis. To address this issue, exercise ECG data should be added to resting ECG data to optimize AI, machine learning, and neural network analysis systems. This may ultimately help us decipher AI analytics, all the while limiting unnecessary genetic testing, health care costs, and unwanted psychological distress due to false-positive results. In particular, the exercise dataset would allow more congenitally affected individuals who may go undetected at rest to be identified and properly managed. In return, AI may be advantageous for the much-needed standardization of exercise testing in LQTS screening and follow-up. Manual and automatic ECG analysis is very time consuming, especially when using continuous ECG recording. As mentioned by Dehkordi et al,1Dehkordi N.R. Dehkordi N.R. Toudeshki K.K. Farjoo M.H. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of long QT syndrome: a review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024; 2: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.11.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar AI offers promising solutions by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of ECG interpretation. Notably, AI algorithms can process ECG data more rapidly than human experts, provide real-time analysis, and reduce interobserver variability.1Dehkordi N.R. Dehkordi N.R. Toudeshki K.K. Farjoo M.H. Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of long QT syndrome: a review of current state, challenges, and future perspectives.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024; 2: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.11.003Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar Therefore, there could be a 2-way advantage of using exercise in conjunction with AI for the improvement of LQTS identification and diagnosis. The combination of resting ECG, continuous exercise ECG, and AI analytics could be the key recipe to ensure that individuals with a concealed form of LQTS do not go undetected, and consequently, dangerously unmanaged.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».