An Evaluation Of The Impact Of Land Cover Change On Seasonal Evapotranspiration Estimates In The Upper Gundar River Basin, Tamilnadu, India
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The water cycle significantly impacts the Earth's atmospheric temperature and overall energy balance. In a warming climate, changes in the hydrologic cycle, both spatially (planetary, continental, and regional) and temporally (daily and yearly), are anticipated. Factors driving this change at a watershed scale include increased agricultural intensity, evolving land use patterns, and the development of industrial and urban areas. Studies also suggest an expected decline in overall runoff due to changing precipitation patterns and, notably, evapotranspiration (ET), encompassing plant transpiration and land evaporation. This outlines the importance of studying ET dynamics at a watershed scale. This research focuses on the Upper Gundar River Basin, part of the Gundar basin in Tamil Nadu, India. To estimate basin-scale ET, the widely used Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) is employed. SEBAL utilizes satellite imagery, digital elevation models, and weather data during the time and date of satellite overpass to estimate actual evapotranspiration in the resolution consistent with the imagery. The initial phase involves land cover classification and change detection between summer and monsoon seasons annually for the years 2006, 2014, and 2021 using Landsat data with minimal cloud cover. The land cover classes that are identified are - water, built-up land, exposed soil, barren land, agricultural land, and the invasive species Prosopis Juliflora, which is widely prevalent in the region. A random forest approach is used due to its capability to handle complex datasets in heterogeneous landscapes. The subsequent phase involves validating the gridded Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) data by comparing it with in-situ data obtained from five stations in close proximity to the region of interest. The in-situ data and the GLDAS data are utilized to meet the specific requirements for the day and time of the acquisition date, respectively. The variables under comparison are average temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and reference evapotranspiration. This comparative analysis employs correlation coefficients and considers the monthly time scale corresponding to Landsat data acquisition. Identification of stations demonstrating the most agreement is conducted for each season. The final phase involves utilizing in-situ daily data and instantaneous GLDAS data during satellite overpass, alongside ASTER digital elevation model, for SEBAL computations on the same date-season combinations mentioned earlier. The in-situ data necessary for SEBAL is obtained by interpolating the data from five nearby weather stations to match GLDAS resolution. Comparisons between SEBAL-derived actual evapotranspiration estimates for different land cover classes and those from EEFlux, which operates on the Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC) algorithm, involve visual analysis via box plots and quantification using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and correlation coefficients. As the end goal, agricultural water requirements for cropped regions are calculated for each day by multiplying the actual evapotranspiration estimates with the area of the land cover class. Strategies to meet the water demand are discussed and outlined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».