Endoscopic submucosal dissection for diverticulum using combination of countertraction and circumferential-inversion method
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been attempted in colorectal tumors involving diverticula, which lack a muscularis propria [ 1 ]. However, the R0 resection rate in tumors infiltrating the interior of the diverticulum remains low, and there is a risk of perforation [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ]. We recently reported a novel traction method called the circumferential-inversion method, which inverts the lesion circumferentially [ 5 ]. Here, we describe the effectiveness of an innovative ESD approach combining countertraction and the circumferential-inversion method for a diverticulum-infiltrating tumor ([ Video 1 ]). Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel approach that combines the countertraction and circumferential-inversion method for diverticulum-infiltrating tumors.Video 1 The case was an 18-mm 0–IIa tumor involving a diverticulum in the sigmoid colon ([ Fig. 1 ] a ). The tumor infiltrated and fully covered a diverticulum in its center ([ Fig. 1 ] b ). Following complete circumferential incision and trimming, the specimen was grasped at four points using an 8-mm diameter orthodontic rubber band and clips (SureClip 8 mm; Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) ([ Fig. 1 ] c ). By combining a water pressure method and the circumferential-inversion method, we were able to sufficiently dissect fibrotic submucosa around the central diverticulum. However, dissection of the submucosa inside the diverticulum remained challenging ([ Fig. 1 ] d ). Therefore, we fixed the rubber band to the contralateral mucosa using an additional clip for countertraction ([ Fig. 2 ] a ). As a result, the tumor inside the diverticulum was pulled into the lumen by the clips, which held the specimen circumferentially ([ Fig. 2 ] b ). Additional dissection facilitated complete separation of the tumor from the diverticulum ([ Fig. 2 ] c ) and R0 resection was completed without complications ([ Fig. 2 ] d ). Fig. 1 Endoscopic submucosal dissection using the circumferential-inversion method. a An 18-mm 0–IIa tumor involving the diverticulum in the sigmoid colon. b The tumor infiltrated and fully covered a diverticulum in its center. c After a complete circumferential incision and trimming were performed, the specimen was grasped at four points using an 8-mm diameter orthodontic rubber band and clips. d By combining a water pressure method and the circumferential-inversion method, we were able to sufficiently dissect fibrotic submucosa around the central diverticulum. However, dissection of the submucosa inside the diverticulum remained challenging. Fig. 2 Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel approach that combines the countertraction and circumferential-inversion method. a We fixed the rubber band to the contralateral mucosa using an additional clip for countertraction. b The tumor inside the diverticulum was pulled into the lumen by the clips, which held the specimen circumferentially. c Additional dissection facilitated complete separation of the tumor from the diverticulum. d R0 resection was completed without complications. In summary, the circumferential-inversion method is an inversion traction method that simplifies tumor dissection around the central diverticulum from all directions. Additionally, the data reported here demonstrate that the combination of countertraction and the circumferential-inversion method enable successful removal of a tumor from inside the diverticulum in the correct direction. We propose that the circumferential-inversion method facilitates ESD for diverticulum-infiltrating tumors. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos . Publication History Article published online: 30 January 2024 © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».