Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Outstanding examples of economic development in Aboriginal communities across the country are reported in a variety of documents, but most extensively and consistently in the Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development.In this issue, we highlight a variety of activities that extend from British Columbia to Ontario, and with several examples from Manitoba in particular.The words of those who are involved in these ventures are captured for anyone to learn and benefit from, and they include insight into the hard lessons those individuals have learned from their venture experiences.To start, recognized by their peers for their individual efforts, the stories of Tom Maness and Lyle Leo, who are involved with community development projects that are reaping benefits for community members in terms of employment and opportunity, are highlighted.Next, two organizations -Long Plain First Nation and Khowutzun Development Corporation -are applauded for their efforts.Their stories reflect the importance to have people who understand what is needed to move forward and to have leaders who are able to help them accomplish the dreams of their communities.These communities have succeeded in that journey.Their stories give readers insights into their particular experiences.But don't stop there.These stories ring true at differing levels in many communities across this country.That is their power.Those are the gifts that they are willing to share.Capacity building starts with people and it is being done in many communities.This section ends by sharing the experiences of the people at the Ma Mawi Wi Chi Itata Centre in the City of Winnipeg.There you find an evolving story from great need to great perception.Questions such as "How can community be nurtured in a large city?" and "How can families be helped to thrive?" are highlighted.They have learned, over many years, what it takes to make a difference, and that is shared in Brendan Reimer's article.One 1 Lessons from Experience quote is especially thought-provoking, "You can't build the capacity well without actually being in the communities and building the relationships."We acknowledge those who work in the communities, build capacity, and develop and maintain relationships and partnerships.They are making a huge difference, and we are learning from their work, and celebrate their success.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».