Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We have land.We have plenty of labour.We have capital, both financial and intellectual and we know how to get more.We have a strong desire to create better lives for ourselves.We have a developing institutional infrastructure and capacity.capable of encouraging and supporting the development of our communities in many areas: economy, health, education, social welfare, culture.The decade since the release of the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples has seen an explosion in the number of small businesses started by Aboriginal peoples.The organizations we created are starting to effect change within our communities: employment rates are up slightly in some areas, household incomes are slowly moving away from being primarily government transfer payments; high school retention and graduation rates have improved.Progress is slow and many still live in poverty and on the margins of society.Many live in substandard houses; Many don't have good access to clean drinking water or reliable sources of energy to heat and light their homes.The relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples is still problematic on many fronts.There is still much work to be done to improve the material quality of life in this country for many of us.It is easy to focus on the problems.They are real.They affect the lives of many every day.They can be overwhelming.It is the work of each and every one of us to work to solve them; to create the partnerships that are necessary and to effect social change that allow for greater life choices.The recommendations of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal people form a solid basis for moving forward.In moving forward, we must not ignore some of the very real changes that have occurred over the last three decade, some stimulated by the work of the Royal Commission.We, in conjunction with the courts, have shifted the self government debate from being about the right to govern to being about how to govern.The philosophical debate about the right to self government was over with the adoption of the Penner Report in 1985.After its adoption, it was not a question of whether or not we as Aboriginal people had a right to govern themselves but in what form and with what powers.We are now debating details, a debate that will last forever if Canadian experience is any indication.We have been engaged in a debate about powers and jurisdictions, lands and resources over the last 25 years,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».