Review of Alexander Rehding, <i>Hugo Riemann and the Birth of Modern Musical Thought</i> (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The transformation of Hugo Riemann from obsolete pedant to influential thinker has been one of the most remarkable developments in North American music theory within the past twenty years.Those who have been intellectually and musically formed by Schenkerian ideas have likely not welcomed this development, since the views of Schenker on Riemann-the great Un-Ohr-were strong and unambiguous.Indeed, the relegation of Riemann's theoretical ideas to risible futility was a kind of recreational activity among ardent Schenkerians.Oswald Jonas, for example, after arguing for the uselessness of function theory and noting that "such harmonic hearing and interpretation can even surpass a manner of composing-although the two are obviously interdependent," cites a passage from a string quartet by Max Reger-the great Gegenbeispieler-analyzed in the Riemannian way."Need anything further be added?," he sarcases in the following, one-sentence paragraph. (1)] The ascendancy of Schenkerian theory in America in the 1960s did not displace a previous Riemannian episteme, for Riemann's ideas had already lost whatever purchase they had on American theory long before, the decisive event likely being the First World War.Before that calamity, Americans seeking advanced training in composition (and, therefore, theory) generally sought it in Germany (e.g., MacDowell, Chadwick) and brought back German methods of instruction.As Riemannian ideas began to be widely adopted in Germany in the years before the war, they started to show up on these shores (e.g., Dirk Haagman's Tonal Function: Harmony, Scales, and Intervals, the first volume of which was published in 1916). (2)ut the war exposed North Americans to powerful anti-German propaganda of a then unprecedented force: not only was sauerkraut restyled as "liberty cabbage" and the city of Berlin, Ontario, renamed Kitchener over the objections of its inhabitants, but all things German were subject to patriotic disapproval, leading even to the public abuse of Germanspeaking immigrants and their descendents.After such a dose of cultural vitriol, it is hardly surprising that the second volume of Haagman's book never appeared, that Copland, Piston, and other post-war composers journeyed to France instead of Germany, and that Riemann's ideas gained no new advocates on this side of the Atlantic.[3] The rehabilitation and neo-logizing of Riemann occurred thanks to David Lewin's admirable ability to adopt (or at least try out) a modus audiendi from historical music theory.His 1982 article "A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions" (3) took the fun out of Riemann jokes, and subsequent important work by Lewin, his students, and other interested scholars succeeded in making them politically incorrect.The culmination of the first phase of revisionist activity was Richard Cohn's "survey and historical perspective" that prefaced an issue
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».