The Collective Voices of Women Workers and What C190 and R206 Represent
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This chapter reflects on the global campaign, how it was brought into the negotiations for an ILO Convention in the Standard-Setting Committees in 2018 and 2019 and what was important from the perspective of workers involved in both the negotiations and the global campaign. It hears from some of the campaigners and participants in the negotiations about their role, defining moments and activities to be prioritized looking ahead. Reflections on the standard-setting process As the reporter from the Standard-Setting Committee said to the ILC, discussions were often difficult and tense, but he notes: “The Committee's outcome is evidence of the enduring value and strength of social dialogue” (ILO 2019e: 2). As one worker member of the committee, Martle Keyter of MISA and FEDUSA, noted when interviewed, 2018 had been difficult and often conflictual, but the 2019 negotiations, although hard, consolidated the need for a Convention: In 2019, when it fell together, particularly we fought hard on domestic violence, and – wow! – how emotional we were … The negotiation process was long and hard, often with exchanges going back and forward, often into the night. But we got agreement in the end. The workers’ spokesperson was under enormous pressure, particularly when it became heated. Credit was also given to the skilful role played by the chairperson of the committee, and to the courage needed to find solutions, sometimes through an “unorthodox approach to its proceedings in order to allow for the consideration of different, but related, parts of the text, thereby reaching better conclusions as to the overall impact of the proposed instruments” (ILO 2019e: 2). The Drafting Committee played an important role, often sitting well into the early hours of the morning. The representatives from governments, employers and workers in the Drafting Committee ensured the alignment of the two official final texts in French and English. The workers’ spokesperson, Marie Clarke Walker, brought an energy and passion to the negotiations in 2018 and 2019. As a black woman, committed to ensuring “no one is left behind”, she skilfully crafted a feminist, inclusive and intersectional approach throughout the negotiations. Clarke Walker was a member of the ILO Governing Body and a senior trade union leader with the CLC in Canada.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,027 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».