First measurements of radon‐220 diffusion in mice tumors, towards treatment planning in diffusing alpha‐emitters radiation therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Diffusing alpha‐emitters radiation therapy (“Alpha‐DaRT”) is a new method for treating solid tumors with alpha particles, relying on the release of the short‐lived alpha‐emitting daughter atoms of radium‐224 from interstitial sources inserted into the tumor. Alpha‐DaRT tumor dosimetry is governed by the spread of radium's progeny around the source, as described by an approximate framework called the “diffusion‐leakage model”. The most important model parameters are the diffusion lengths of radon‐220 and lead‐212, and their estimation is therefore essential for treatment planning. Purpose Previous works have provided initial estimates for the dominant diffusion length, by measuring the activity spread inside mice‐borne tumors several days after the insertion of an Alpha‐DaRT source. The measurements, taken when lead‐212 was in secular equilibrium with radium‐224, were interpreted as representing the lead‐212 diffusion length. The aim of this work is to provide first experimental estimates for the diffusion length of radon‐220, using a new methodology. Methods The diffusion length of radon‐220 was estimated from autoradiography measurements of histological sections taken from 24 mice‐borne subcutaneous tumors of five different types. Unlike previous studies, the source dwell time inside the tumor was limited to 30 min, to prevent the buildup of lead‐212. To investigate the contribution of potential non‐diffusive processes, experiments were done in two sets: fourteen in vivo tumors, where during the treatment the tumors were still carried by the mice with active blood supply, and 10 ex‐vivo tumors, where the tumors were excised before source insertion and kept in a medium at with the source inside. Results The measured diffusion lengths of radon‐220, extracted by fitting the recorded activity pattern up to 1.5 mm from the source, lie in the range , with no significant difference between the average values measured in in‐vivo and ex‐vivo tumors: versus . However, in‐vivo tumors display an enhanced spread of activity 2–3 mm away from the source. This effect is not explained by the current model and is much less pronounced in ex‐vivo tumors. Conclusions The average measured radon‐220 diffusion lengths in both in‐vivo and ex‐vivo tumors are consistent with published data on the diffusion length of radon in water and lie close to the upper limit of the previously estimated range of . The observation that close to the source there is no apparent difference between in‐vivo and ex‐vivo tumors, and the good agreement with the theoretical model in this region suggest that the spread of radon‐220 is predominantly diffusive in this region. The departure from the model prediction in in‐vivo tumors at large radial distances may hint at potential vascular contribution, which will be the subject of future works.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».