Abstract 3650: Deep learning-based image cytometry and co-localization index in tumor immune microenvironment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: In pathology, digitizing tissue slides has prompted a remarkable development in image analysis using deep learning. This technological advancement is anticipated to aid in pathological diagnosis and to enhance patient management. Deep learning-based image cytometry (DL-IC) enables accurate cell identification and counting and the acquisition of vast amounts of location information from tissue slides. DL-IC can capture information about the diverse and complex tumor immune microenvironment(TIME) and its constituent cells and help identify biomarkers to predict patient treatment efficacy and prognosis. This study will introduce a spatial interaction map and co-localization index (CLI) for the analysis of TIME using DL-IC. Materials and Methods: Cu-Cyto, a deep learning-based image analysis technology, was used in this study; bit-pattern kernel filtering technology, which can accurately count cells while avoiding the determination of multiple cell counts, was used by Cu-Cyto (Abe T, et al. Anticancer Res. 43:3755, 2023). First, the accuracy of cell counting using Cu-Cyto was evaluated. Second, tumor tissue slides with immunohistochemical (IHC) and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining were prepared from surgical specimens of patients with rectal cancer who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), and the relationship between the co-localization index (CLI) of cancer cells and CD8+T cells and prognosis was investigated. CLI was defined to predict cell- cell interactions on the basis of the relative distances between different cell types (Nagasaka T. PCT/JP 2021/021455). Results: The performances of three versions of Cu-Cyto were evaluated according to their learning stages. In the early stage of learning, the F1 score for immunostained CD8+ T cells (0.343) was higher than that for non-immunostained cells (adenocarcinoma cells [0.040] and lymphocytes [0.002]). In the latest stage of learning, the F1 scores for adenocarcinoma cells, lymphocytes, and CD8+ T cells were 0.589, 0.889, and 0.911, respectively. Next, we examined the correlation of CLI between cancer cells and CD8+ T cells with prognosis: patients with a higher CLI significantly prolonged five-year disease-free survival (P=0.038), while there was no substantial difference in five-year overall survival (P=0.57). Conclusion]: Cu-Cyto performed well in cell determination. In particular, IHC was able to increase the learning efficiencies in the early stages of learning. The CLI calculated using Cu-Cyto ts an objective, reproducible, and innovative quantitative approach for assessing cell-cell interactions, which has been shown to be associated with recurrence-free survival in patients with rectal cancer after NACRT. Its performance is expected to improve even further with continuous learning, and the DL-IC can contribute to the implementation of precision oncology. Citation Format: Tomoki Abe, Kimihiro Yamashita, Toru Nagasaka, Tomosuke Mukoyama, Souichirou Miyake, Yasuhiro Ueda, Masayuki Ando, Yuki Okazoe, Takao Tsuneki, Yukari Adachi, Ryunosuke Konaka, Ryuichiro Sawada, Hironobu Goto, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Shingo Kanaji, Takeru Matsuda, Takumi Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Kakeji. Deep learning-based image cytometry and co-localization index in tumor immune microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3650.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».