Abstract 4847: Diverging global incidence trends of early-onset and later-onset cancers
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: The global increase of the incidence of early-onset cancers (defined as cancers diagnosed at 20-49 years) is a serious public health problem. However, it is understudied whether the incidence of early-onset cancers has increased in parallel with that of later-onset cancers (defined as cancers diagnosed at 50 years or above) or only the incidence of early-onset cancer has increased worldwide. We therefore evaluated the recent global trends of the incidence of early-onset cancers and later-onset cancers. Method: We retrieved sex-stratified age-standardized incidence rates of early-onset cancer and later-onset cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 in 39 countries where data was available from the GLOBOCAN database. Using joinpoint regression models, we assessed average annual percentage change (AAPC) by cancer types and countries, with statistical significance corresponding to a 95% CI that does not include zero. Results: We observed statistically significant positive AAPCs for early-onset cancers (AAPC [95% CI], 1.9% [1.8%, 2.1%] for females, 0.7% [0.6%, 0.9%] for males in all available countries combined) in many early-onset cancer types, including colorectal, esophagus, gallbladder, kidney, liver, multiple myeloma, pancreas, prostate, stomach, testis, thyroid and uterine cancer in many parts of the world. There were variations in many later-onset cancer types depending on cancer types and countries. Notable cancer types that have significantly increased in early-onset cancers but have decreased or showed no change in later-onset cancers include colorectal (5 countries in females and 6 countries in males), uterine (4 countries), and thyroid cancers (5 countries in females and 3 countries in males). In particular, early-onset colorectal cancer has increased but later-onset colorectal cancer has decreased among both sexes in Canada (AAPC [95%CI], early-onset: 1.6% [0.9%, 2.7%], later-onset: -0.8% [-1.0%, -0.5%] for females; early-onset: 1.8% [1.0%, 2.6%], later-onset: -1.2% [-1.5%, -0.9%] for males), USA (Early-onset: 2.0% [1.5%, 2.5%], later-onset: -2.7% [-2.9%, -2.6%] for females; early-onset: 1.6% [1.1%, 2.2%], later-onset: -3.2% [-3.7%, -2.6%] for males), Australia (Early-onset: 1.8% [0.7%, 2.9%], later-onset: -1.0% [-1.5%, -0.6%] for females; early-onset: 1.4% [0.7%, 2.4%], later-onset: -1.5% [-1.9%, -0.9%] for males). Conclusion: Our study highlights differences in cancer incidence trends between certain early-onset and later-onset cancer types in many parts of the world. Notably, early-onset colorectal, uterine, and thyroid cancers have significantly increased but corresponding later-onset cancers have decreased or showed no change in many countries. Different patterns in cancer incidence trends of early-onset and later-onset cancers in different regions should be further investigated to better understand and prevent the increase in the incidence of early-onset cancers. Citation Format: Miyu Terashima, Hwa-Young Lee, Yuta Tsukumo, Satoko Ugai, Minkyo Song, Naoko Sasamoto, Ichiro Kawachi, Tomotaka Ugai. Diverging global incidence trends of early-onset and later-onset cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4847.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle