MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393193570 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.13162

Delayed diagnosis of cervical myelopathy in an adult with Weaver syndrome

2024· letter· en· W4393193570 sur OpenAlexaff
Yvette Ysabel Yao, Ranita Harpreet Kaur Manocha

Notice bibliographique

RevuePM&R · 2024
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Établissements canadiensHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMyelopathyMedicineCervical spinePediatricsSurgeryPsychiatrySpinal cord

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 39-year-old right-handed woman with Weaver syndrome was referred to a physiatrist due to progressive bilateral lower limb spasticity. Weaver syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition associated with rapid bony overgrowth causing intellectual impairment, digital contractures, and appendicular spasticity.1 Only 54 people worldwide are affected.2 This patient's history was significant for mild intellectual impairment, bilateral clubfoot with corrective surgeries, and a right total hip arthroplasty for dysplasia at age 36 years. The patient started walking at 14 months of age. Nine months prior to assessment, she had gradually lost ambulatory and transfer ability, leading to a hospital admission from home 7 months prior to assessment due to inability to live independently. During the 3-month hospital admission, the discharge summary indicated a “medical workup” had been performed, but no cause for loss of ambulatory ability was found and the patient was discharged to a long-term care facility. The workup included bloodwork but no electrodiagnostic testing or central neuraxis imaging. When seen in the physiatry clinic, the patient endorsed a gradual increase in bilateral lower limb tightness over the past 2 years with progressive left more than right hip and knee flexion contractures over the past year. She reported difficulty operating her right joystick-controlled power wheelchair over the last 3 months. There were no sensory symptoms in the upper or lower limbs. She had been using incontinence products since the hospitalization due to urinary frequency and urgency with urge and functional incontinence. There was no dysphagia, dysarthria, or bowel dysfunction reported. On physical examination, there was diffuse hyperreflexia with moderate left proximal upper limb spasticity and severe spasticity in the left more than right hip adductors, hip flexors, and knee flexors (Table 1, Figure 1). There was bilateral distal upper limb hypotonia with symmetric atrophy of the interossei, hypothenar, and thenar eminences. Bilateral upper limb power was largely normal although there was significant weakness in bilateral abductor digiti minimi, first dorsal interosseous, and abductor pollicis brevis. There was less than antigravity strength in the lower limbs. The patient reported normal light touch and pinprick sensation in all limbs. Vibration sensation was reported as normal in the upper limbs but reduced at the great toe interphalangeal joints bilaterally and normal at the medial malleoli bilaterally. As Weaver syndrome does not cause polyneuropathy or distal myopathy,3 the patient was referred for electrodiagnostic testing for the hand findings. Routine upper limb sensory and motor nerve conduction studies were normal. Electromyography was poorly tolerated due to anxiety so only the first dorsal interosseous of the hand was needled. This showed normal insertional activity, no spontaneous activity, and reduced activation. Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine was also performed. This showed multilevel spondylosis causing multilevel spinal cord compression, most severe at C3–C4 (Figure 2), with myelomalacia at this level. Within 5 weeks of the MRI, the patient underwent a posterior C3–C7 laminectomy with C3–T2 fusion. She continues to be followed and her neurological signs and symptoms have remained stable. This is the first reported case of cervical myelopathy in an adult with Weaver syndrome. Cervical kyphosis, early cervical osteoarthritis, and lack of development of the midcervical vertebral bodies have been reported in Weaver syndrome.2 Atlantoaxial instability has also been reported in six children with Weaver syndrome.4, 5 Any of these conditions may lead to cervical myelopathy, which can present with upper and/or lower limb spasticity, upper limb weakness, gait impairment, dysphagia, dysarthria, and bowel and/or bladder dysfunction.6 Although spasticity can occur in Weaver Syndrome, this tends to be mild and nonprogressive.3 This patient's spasticity was severe and progressive, in keeping with a diagnosis outside of Weaver syndrome. Although cervical myelopathy is a common cause of loss of ambulatory ability,7 this patient's myelopathy was undetected during a 3-month acute care hospitalization for loss of independent ambulation ability. Ascertainment bias, where a physician's thinking is shaped by societal stereotypes,8 may have led to assumptions about the quality of life of an individual with a genetic condition and mild intellectual impairment who was now using a wheelchair. This may have prevented the health care team from considering the same standard investigations they might have considered for an individual without impairments. As physiatrists regularly work with individuals with impairments, we should understand how cognitive biases contribute to diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making. Physiatrists are well suited to act as advocates to increase awareness of such biases that may affect patient care. This case demonstrates the importance of maintaining a high level of suspicion for cervical myelopathy in patients with Weaver syndrome who display progressive spasticity, worsening ambulatory ability, decreasing hand function, or changes in bladder function. Early recognition of cervical myelopathy in Weaver syndrome may lead to interventions to prevent functional deterioration. We would like to thank the patient for sharing their story with this audience. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The patient discussed in the manuscript has provided informed written consent for the publication of this case report.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,202
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,908

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePM&RMême sujetCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersTravaux en français237 207