Neurometabolic therapy of mild cognitive impairment in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective. To evaluate the effect of a sequential therapy regimen with Mexidol (500 mg injections intravenously for 14 days) and Mexidol FORTE 250 (250 mg tablets 3 times a day for 60 days) on higher cortical functions in patients with moderate cognitive disorders in chronic cerebral ischemia. Material and methods. A comparative, prospective study included 63 patients with chronic cerebral ischemia with moderate cognitive impairment. All patients received basic therapy aimed at reducing risk factors (antihypertensive, antithrombotic drugs as indicated). Patients of the main group (30 people: 12 men, 18 women) received Mexidol intravenously 500 mg in 100 ml of 0.9% NaCl solution once a day for 14 days, then Mexidol FORTE 250 (film-coated tablets) 250 mg 3 times a day for the next 60 days. The comparison group consisted of 33 patients (14 men, 19 women) who received only basic therapy. The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex characteristics and severity of cognitive deficit. We examined cognitive status (MoCA scale, Frontal Dysfunction Battery, 10 Word Memorization tests), severity of asthenia (MFI-20 scale), anxiety and depression (HADS scale), patient’s subjective assessment of the dynamics of the condition (CGI-improvement scale) in 1st, 14th and 74th±5 days of observation. On days 1 and 74±5 of observation, patients were examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the neuronal activity of the cerebral cortex. Results. In the main group, at the time of completion of taking Mexidol and Mexidol FORTE 250, a pronounced cognitive regression was noted (MoCA scale +3 points, difference with the comparison group 1 point (p<0.0001); Frontal Dysfunction Battery test +4 points, difference with comparison group 2 points (p<0.001); memory test «10 words» +2 points, difference with the comparison group 1 point (p<0.05), emotional (HADS anxiety scale –8 points, difference with the comparison group 3 points (p<0.001), depression –3.5 points, difference with the comparison group 1.5 points (p<0.01), asthenic disorders (MFI-20 scale –30 points, difference with the comparison group 15.5 points (p<0.01), improvement in the well-being of patients (CGI-improvement scale –2 points, difference with the comparison group 1 point (p<0.0001). According to the transcranial magnetic stimulation performed, a statistically significant decrease in the central motor conduction time at the level of 1 and 2 motor neurons of the pyramidal tract bilaterally from the start to the end of therapy with Mexidol and Mexidol FORTE 250 was determined (p<0.01). An inverse correlation was found between the time of central motor conduction and the results of the Frontal Dysfunction Battery test at the same time points with left-sided localization of 1 motor neuron (p<0.01). The results of a study of the use of sequential therapy with Mexidol 500 mg IV drip 1 time per day for 14 days followed by oral administration of Mexidol FORTE 250 1 tablet 3 times a day for 60 days indicate its clinical effectiveness and safety in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia with mild cognitive impairment, and also confirm its importance for preventing the progression of cognitive disorders.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».