MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393278275 · doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihae026

Antibiotic prescription sources and use among under-5 children with fever/cough in sub-Saharan Africa

2024· article· en· W4393278275 sur OpenAlex
Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, Godness Kye Biney, Qi Wang, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw, Sanni Yaya

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Health · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Établissements canadiensUniversity of OttawaGlobal Affairs CanadaInternational Development Research Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMedical prescriptionLogistic regressionOdds ratioConfidence intervalPediatricsAntibioticsDemographyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Childhood febrile illness is among the leading causes of hospital admission for children <5 y of age in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Antibiotics have played a pivotal role in enhancing health outcomes, especially for children <5 y of age. Antibiotics prescription pattern evidence exists for SSA, however, prescription sources (either from qualified or unqualified sources) and use among children with fever or cough have not been explored. Thus the present study assessed antibiotic prescription sources and use among children <5 y of age with fever and cough in SSA. METHODS: We used Demographic and Health Survey data from 37 countries with a total of 18 866 children <5 y of age who had fever/cough. The surveys span from 2006 to 2021. The dependent variable was antibiotics taken for fever/cough based on prescriptions from qualified sources. The data were weighted using sampling weight, primary sampling unit and strata. A mixed-effects logistic regression model (both fixed and random effects) was fitted since the outcome variable was binary. Model comparison was made based on deviance (-2 log likelihood) and likelihood ratio tests were used for model comparison. Variables with p≤0.2 in the bivariable analysis were considered for the multivariable mixed-effects binary logistic regression model. In the final model, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and p<0.05 in the multivariable model were used to declare a significant association with taking antibiotics for fever/cough prescribed from qualified sources. RESULTS: The percentage of unqualified antibiotic prescriptions among children <5 y of age who had a fever/cough and took antibiotics was 67.19% (95% CI 66.51 to 67.85), ranging from 40.34% in Chad to 92.67% in Sao Tome. The odds of taking antibiotics prescribed from unqualified sources for fever/cough among children <5 y of age living in rural areas were 1.23 times higher (AOR 1.23 [95% CI 1.13 to 1.33]) compared with urban children. The odds of taking antibiotics prescribed from qualified sources for fever/cough among children <5 y of age whose mothers had primary, secondary and higher education decreased by 14% (AOR=0.86 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.93]), 21% (AOR 0.79 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.86]) and 21% (AOR 0.79 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.95]) compared with those whose mother had no formal education, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the majority of the children who received antibiotics obtained them from unqualified sources in the 37 SSA countries. Our findings underscore the significance of addressing healthcare disparities, improving access to qualified healthcare providers, promoting maternal education and empowering mothers in healthcare decision-making to ensure appropriate antibiotic use in this vulnerable population. Further research and interventions targeted at these factors are warranted to optimize antibiotic prescribing practices and promote responsible antibiotic use in the management of fever and cough in children <5 y of age.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,330

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle