MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393287542 · doi:10.2979/jims.00011

Lives of Hadith

2023· article· en· W4393287542 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Layla Sein

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Islamic and Muslim Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIslamic Studies and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lives of Hadith Layla Sein (bio) The 51st Annual (Virtual) Conference of the North American Association of Islamic and Muslim Studies (NAAIMS) on "Lives of Hadith" was cosponsored by the University of Florida (UFL), Gainesville, on October 20, 2022, under the direction of Sarra Tlili (NAAIMS President and Program Chair), associate professor, Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, University of Florida. She welcomed the panelists and guests for their participation and thanked various UFL departments for their financial support. The conference consisted of four panel sessions. Panel Session 1 highlighted "Hadith in Contemporary Islamic Thought," with Omer Awass (American Islamic College, Chicago, IL) serving as discussant. Presentations in this session provided details about the role and status of Hadith as compared to the "authentic and authoritative" status of the Qur'an. The first presentation "Are Ḥadīth the Problem? Ḥadīth, Reform, and Modernity" was presented by Emad Hamdeh (Embry Riddle University, Daytona Beach, FL). He reviewed how today's digital age and technological developments impacted all facets of life, including religion and scriptural interpretation that "led to external and internal pressure for Muslims to reform Islam to meet the demands of modernity." Hamdeh noted that Ḥadīth fall into the following four categories in order to distinguish the authenticity of the Prophet's sayings: authentic (ṣaḥīḥ); accepted (ḥasan); weak (ḍaʿīf); and fabricated (mawḍūʿ). In addition to speaking about the difference between weak and fabricated hadiths, he examined the following three groups and their approaches to Hadith, beginning with the Qur'anists, who [End Page 120] "reject the authority of Ḥadīth;" the "Modernists, such as Muḥammad ʿAbduh and Rashid Riḍā;" and today's "modern hadīth scholars who seek to reform ḥadīth by returning to a strict commitment to the science of ḥadīth." During his discussion about the impact of weak hadiths, Hamdeh focused on the impact that the controversial Salafi scholar, Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī's (d. 1999), has on the field of ḥadīth studies and stated that according to al-Albānī', "there is a social cost that results from the use of weak ḥadīth, because they promote practices that have no authentic basis in Islam. This results in Muslims performing actions that have no basis in Islamic scripture; Sufi practices such as saint worship, dancing, and whirling dervishes are examples of 'foreign practices' that have been adopted by Muslims in many regions." The second presentation which focused on "Reflecting on Hadith Commentary: Continuity and Change" by Joel Blecher (George Washington University, Washington, DC) provided a preview of the "Afterword" to Blecher's co-edited book with Stefanie Brinkmann on "continuities and changes within the tradition and genre of hadith commentary from the classical to the contemporary periods (forthcoming with Edinburgh University Press)." Blecher's presentation examined how the state of the field of hadith "lacked an entry in the one-hundred year history of the Encyclopedia of Islam until 2018." He stated that an international collaboration of 13 scholars hopes to expand hadith studies "to go beyond the questions of transmission and authenticity since its inception [and examine] methods and approaches from manuscript studies, social history, and digital humanities in order to outline a future research agenda." During Q&A, the panel discussant, Omer Awass, noted that "it would be instructive to researchers to point out what contemporary hermeneutical methodologies and approaches (both Western and non-Western) could be helpful in shedding new understandings on such hadith commentaries." This was followed by Nadir Ansari's presentation (University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada) on "The Role of Ḥadīth in the Specification of the Ambiguous (ta yīn al-mubham) in the Qur'an: An Analysis of the Qur'anic Exegesis of Aḥmad al-Dīn Amritsari (d. 1936, India)." Ansari examined how the role of ḥadīth in the South Asian modernist Muslim reform was shaped by the "specification of the ambiguous (taᶜyīn al-mubham) in the Qur'an." During his talk he explained that his reference to modernist Islamic reform was an attempt to "reconcile Islam with colonial modernity through interpretation of sacred texts, while trying to remain authentic." Ansari's...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,057
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,285

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Islamic and Muslim StudiesMême sujetIslamic Studies and HistoryTravaux en français237 207