Methods of examination in physical therapy, and occupational therapy of people after stroke (clinical case)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
the prognosis of recovery of patients after acute cerebrovascular accident depends on the type, severity, and area of brain damage. This article highlights standardized tests and scales for physical therapy and occupational therapy for patients after stroke. An example is given of a clinical case of a patient with stroke consequences, with right-sided spastic hemiplegia. Medical rehabilitation was provided in April 2023 at the Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise "Consultative and Diagnostic Center", branch №6, Sviatoshynskyi district, Kyiv, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. After the patient visited the outpatient department of physical and rehabilitation medicine, the examination was conducted by the attending physician. A multidisciplinary team of a physical therapist and an occupational therapist was involved. An important step is the use of standardized tests and scales in physical therapy and occupational therapy. Based on the results of the examinations, the patient's goals are determined, and an individual rehabilitation program is built using evidence-based physical therapy and occupational therapy methods to provide a high-quality and effective rehabilitation cycle. Description of the objective. The standardized tests and scales in physical therapy, and occupational therapy are analyzed on the example of a clinical case of a patient after a stroke with right-sided spastic hemiplegia. Materials and methods. The clinician's handbook for 2020 on stroke rehabilitation was analyzed, with the justification of standardized tests and scales for physical therapy, and occupational therapy. A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted, which included 44 scientific randomized trials and meta-analyses with accurate diagnoses of tests and scales for physical therapy and occupational therapy. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were used to assess stroke. Modified Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spastic muscles in patients with neurological disorders. To determine cognitive outcomes and complications after stroke: Montreal Outcome Cognitive Assessment (MOCA); Modified Barthel Index (BI); Line Drawing Test. For motor function: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA); Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Instrument (CAHAI). Berg Balance Assessment; Morse Fall Risk Test; Stand and Walk Test. Results. The results of the initial examination in physical therapy and occupational therapy determined the patient's functional and cognitive state, consequences, and limitations arising after a stroke. The intermediate examination summarizes the effectiveness of the selected rehabilitation measures. If the patient's results remain unchanged, the physical and occupational therapist changes the approach and methods to achieve the goals. The final examination analyzes the dynamics of restoration of impaired functions, and achievement of goals by the end of the rehabilitation cycle. Therefore, we used the patient's clinical case to compare the initial, intermediate, and final examinations. This allowed us to analyze the results and determine the effectiveness of the selected individual rehabilitation program. Conclusions. The main principle of providing quality rehabilitation measures is the examination in the clinical practice of a physical therapist, and occupational therapist, which is used to measure the goals and compare the results achieved.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,012 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».