MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393371500 · doi:10.1525/aft.2024.51.1.1

From the Editor

2024· article· en· W4393371500 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Vanmeenen

Notice bibliographique

RevueAfterimage · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Welcome to a new year and the first issue of Afterimage Volume 51. We hope you enjoyed our special 50th anniversary issue (published in December 2023); do let us know what resonated with you most or how you might use these new pieces reflecting on earlier published texts in your scholarship or classroom. We are looking forward to publishing broad and deep coverage and providing an open venue for fresh ideas and diverse voices for many years to come.We begin this new volume with a photo essay by Parin Dossa who first recounts how the British colonization of Uganda (1894–1961) led to her family’s displacement. She reflects on how the “subdued narrative of the correlation between colonization and displacement” relates to the situation in Afghanistan and the diaspora across countries such as Canada, where her family settled. Asking, “How do we work toward an ethics of coexistence?,” Dossa suggests that photography helps to address this goal of seeing ourselves “as people inhabiting planet Earth rather than residing within politicized boundaries of ‘them’ and ‘us,’” and demonstrates her approach through an examination of documentary images from her own anthropological studies.In our second essay, Yazan Alloujami discusses “art and the prosthetic gaze,” tracking how, “today, the spectator’s agency is reduced to whether or not to take a picture, while the artist’s is reduced to whether or not the work catches attention.” Alloujami writes that “the new mode of seeing is swiping,” arguing that “only by dereifying the online will the offline be saved and vice-versa.”Three feature articles provide the centerpiece of this issue. Michael Anthony Turcios explores how Jordan Peele’s 2022 film Nope critiques extractive capitalism. In focusing on how the film “mobilizes fabulation to explore cinema’s erasure of Blackness from its history as an example of racial extraction,” Turcios demonstrates how Peele’s use of the “trope of the alien-monster as a metaphor” to comment on anthropogenic threats also “makes a pointed critique of human misuse of media technologies due to an insatiable avarice for notoriety.”DB Bauer has developed the term 3D transversal media “out of the persistent need for a shorthand umbrella term for this specific kind of 3D media that defies extant media terminology.” Bauer delves into how “the dual meaning of media drives its broad usage within media studies” and how “transversal media can move from one location to another.” Bauer explains how these media move not only to and from, but across file format, medium and interface, software and platform, affordance and application, as well as diverse communities of practice, and uses Thutmose’s bust of Nefertiti as a vibrant cross-platform example. “Taking a medium-specific approach to transversal media,” Bauer argues, “makes possible new forms of analysis, creativity, and application.”Dale Hudson shares how the works of Palestinian filmmaker Annemarie Jacir challenge the erasure of Palestine and Palestinians and highlights how the economics of the industry function as a response to both story and politics. By telling stories with protagonists who can seem like “unruly subjects” to foreign funders, the films can be seen as “unruly subjects” to critics as well. Hudson concludes, “To remain Palestinian, stories cannot be reduced to universal humanism or sacrificed to neoliberal market economies. They have a responsibility to represent community.”We start our reviews section with Chelsea Shi-Chao Liu on the exhibition Charlotte Zhang: Paradise Holds Itself Shut, which was recently on view at Goes to Ocean, in Koreatown, Los Angeles. Zhang’s multimedia works include medical illustrations, pornography, military imagery, and pop cultural perversions to address “the abject pleasures of Asiatic womanhood as produced through the sexual economies of war, immigration, and marriage,” as Liu describes the work’s intent. Liu continues, “In suturing together these grotesqueries of history, Zhang holds a funhouse mirror to the narratives of romance, rescue, and redemption that violently regulate Asian women in the United States empire.” Maria Quinata reviews Citizens of Photography: The Camera and the Political Imagination, edited by Christopher Pinney with the PhotoDemos Collective. This new collection of essays looks at popular uses of photography in regions with a history of conflict including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Greece, India, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Quinata notes that the ideas of Ariella Azoulay’s Civil Imagination: A Political Ontology of Photography “[loom] large throughout each chapter, reinforcing how significant her work is for scholars currently grappling with the relationship between photographic practices and political representation” and concludes that Citizens of Photography “offers a thought-provoking and convincing argument for how everyday photographic practices utilized by ‘the people’ have profound political effects.” Alisia Grace Chase reviews Track Changes: A Handbook for Art Criticism, edited by Mira Dayal and Josephine Heston. Chase reveals where she finds that this “predominately feminist” and “rigorously honest” text, with its amplified calls for collectivity, falls short while praising the book for its notable “candor…regarding tacit cultural expectations of solidarity.” * * *As always, we welcome submissions of scholarly articles intended for peer review, as well as reports on events and happenings (in person and virtual); essays; photo essays; interviews with artists, curators, writers, and theorists; and exhibition, book, film, video, event, and project reviews. We cover photography, film and video, new media, book arts, the analog and the digital. We publish dossiers and accept proposals for guest-edited issues as well. Please see “Submit” on our website for more information or inquire about guidelines.We at Afterimage wish you a pleasant spring season.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,542
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAfterimageMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207