The Utility of a Smartphone-Based Retinal Imaging Device as a Screening Tool in an Outpatient Clinic Setting: Protocol for an Observational Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Glaucoma, a disease leading to the degeneration of retinal ganglion cells, results in changes to the optic nerve head that are often diagnosed late when visual problems arise. With the prevalence of glaucoma surpassing 76 million adults worldwide and with glaucoma being the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world, the early detection and management of glaucoma is imperative. Digital ophthalmoscopes, such as the D-EYE (D-EYE, Srl), have emerged as a technology that uses smartphone cameras with an attachment on the lens to visualize the retina and optic nerve head without the need for dilation. The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the acceptability and feasibility of a D-EYE digital ophthalmoscope to screen for ocular pathology involving the optic nerve, particularly glaucoma. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of a smartphone-based ophthalmoscope as a potential vision screening tool for optic nerve head pathology in participants enrolled in this study. The first specific aim was to determine the ability of the D-EYE smartphone ophthalmoscope to gather high-quality imaging to be used for grading the fundus into low- and high-risk categories for eye pathology. The second specific aim was to determine the difference in the quality of data capture between still retinal images and 30-second retinal video recordings produced by D-EYE smartphone ophthalmoscopes. METHODS: This observational pilot study enrolled 110 patients receiving routine eye care at the University of Florida Health from February 2019 to February 2022 to assess the use of the D-EYE device in capturing still images and 30-second videos of the bilateral retina and optic nerves of each participant. Study participants completed a survey to gather demographics and past medical history data with a particular focus on previous eye health history. Images were reviewed by 5 ophthalmology residents with interrater reliability analysis performed to assess findings. RESULTS: Ophthalmology resident review indicated greater visualizability and clarity of the bilateral retina and optic nerves with 30-second videos of retinal imaging compared with still-image ophthalmic capture. Furthermore, an increase in visualizability and clarity allowed for a more accurate measurement of the cup-to-disc ratio, a diagnostic marker for glaucoma. In addition, the likelihood of referral of the glaucomatous and healthy sample groups to ophthalmologists indicated a greater sensitivity of digital ophthalmoscopes in being able to detect retinal abnormalities requiring early intervention and management, supporting the technology's use as a screening tool. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation suggests that the use of smartphone-based digital ophthalmoscopes can be more effectively applied as a screening tool by capturing 30-second videos compared with still images alone. This novel assessment of an emerging technology in the field of ophthalmology may better equip further research as smartphone camera technology advances. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52650.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,025 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».