MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393496111 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6321327

Deformation composite of the RADARSAT Geophysical Processor System (RGPS) Lagrangian motion data

2022· dataset· en· W4393496111 sur OpenAlexaff
Amélie Bouchat, Nils Hutter

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLagrangianDeformation (meteorology)GeodesyGeologyMotion (physics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsApplied mathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Deformation composite constructed from the Lagrangian RADARSAT Geophysical Processor System (RGPS) Lagrangian motion data for January-February-March, 1997 to 2008. The nominal temporal and spatial scales for the composite data are T* = 3 days, and L* = 10 km. This data is analyzed and compared with model deformation statistics in Bouchat et al., Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx), Part I: Scaling and statistical properties of sea-ice deformation fields, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (2022). The original RGPS Lagrangian motion data set consists in lists of trajectories (time and positions records) for points that are tracked in sequential synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. The trajectories are organized in different “streams”, corresponding to different initial satellite passes over which a set of tracked points were initialized. For all streams, the trajectories are initialized on a uniform 10 km x 10 km grid at the beginning of the winter in November. Each tracked point can therefore be assigned to (i,j) indices corresponding to its initialization location on the grid. As time increases and the position records are updated, the tracked points are no longer uniformly separated, but their assigned (i,j) indices do not change. The trajectory records are updated when the tracking algorithm detects the tracked points in a new SAR image. The update interval is therefore not always the same for all points, nor is it always on the same time/day within a given stream as the tracking algorithm may be unsuccessful for certain images/points. Moreover, the multiple streams can overlap spatially, such that more than one trajectory can be assigned to the same (i,j) indices. Computing strain rates directly from the original RGPS Lagrangian motion product therefore results in deformation estimates that can span a wide range of spatio-temporal scales, that are not temporally coherent across all streams, and that can also be spatially redundant. The goal of constructing a deformation composite from the original RGPS Lagrangian motion product is to generate a coherent set of non-overlapping Lagrangian deformation estimates at fixed time intervals and with a uniform spatial scale that can be used for statistical analysis. The RGPS Lagrangian deformation composite is constructed using the weighted-average pre-processing method described in Bouchat & Tremblay (2020) and Hutter et al. (2020) and summarized here. For each stream separately, we first define quadrilateral Lagrangian cells assigned to the (i,j) indices by combining records from the (i,j), (i+1,j), (i,j+1), and (i+1, j+1) available Lagrangian trajectories. For each (i,j) cell, we then compute the Lagrangian strain rates if, between any two update times, the cell's records have: (i) simultaneous (plus or minus 3 hours) start and end times for all fours corners, (ii) an average time interval for all corners that corresponds to the nominal temporal resolution of T*= 3 days, and (iii) an area at the start time that corresponds to the nominal spatial resolution of L*= 10 km. The strain rates, the cell area, and the start and end times used to compute the cell's strain rates are also assigned to the (i,j) indices. Then, to create the composite deformation estimates at the same fixed start and end dates for all cells, we average the strain rate and area records at each (i,j) indices in fixed 3-day periods starting on January 1st, using the overlapping time between their start/end date interval with the fixed 3-day periods as weight. For visualization purposes only, we also average the cells' corners' starting positions from all records overlapping with the fixed 3-day interval and use these averaged positions as approximate coordinates for the composite deformation cells. Finally, all streams are spatially combined into a single strain rate composite. In the case of spatial overlap between two or more streams, we keep the cells that have the longest time coverage and discard the other ones. There is one netCDF file per year. Data are organized in matrices where the (i,j) indices are the Lagrangian cells identifier. This allows us to keep track of neighbouring cells for the scaling analysis. See below for more information on what variables are included in the files and their structure. 1. Variables included (x1,y1), (x1,y2), (x3,y3), (x4,y4): Average positions of the composite cells' corners. Used for visualization only (deformations should not be computed using these positions) - (meters); A: Composite cells' area - (meters squared); dudx, dudy, dvdx, dvdy: Composite cell's velocity derivatives (strain rates/deformation) - (1/seconds); d_dudx, d_dudy, d_dvdx, d_dvdy: Trajectory error on the composite cells' velocity derivatives - (1/seconds); time: Day of year. *Note: The composite cells were removed if their average position was within 100 km from land. Before comparing the deformation statistics with sea-ice models, one should only keep cells available in both the model and the RGPS composite. 2. Variable structure All variables (except time) are matrices with axes (it, i, j ), where it is the time stamp/iteration and i,j are the cells identifiers. See below for how the cells are defined: |--------------------------------------------------------------> j-axis | | (x1_ij,y1_ij) o --------------------o (x2_ij,y2_ij) | | | | | A_ij or dudx_ij | | | | | (x4_ij,y4_ij) o ------------------- o (x3_ij,y3_ij) | | Vi-axis References: Bouchat, A., & Tremblay, B. (2020). Reassessing the Quality of Sea-Ice Deformation Estimates Derived From the RADARSAT Geophysical Processor System and Its Impact on the Spatiotemporal Scaling Statistics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 125(8), https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015944 Hutter, N. and Losch, M.: Feature-based comparison of sea ice deformation in lead-permitting sea ice simulations, The Cryosphere, 14, 93–113, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-93-2020, 2020. The original RGPS Lagrangian Motion data set can be accessed here: https://asf.alaska.edu/data-sets/derived-data-sets/seaice-measures/sea-ice-measures-data-products/

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,051

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaTravaux en français237 207