MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393569807 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7867344

Data-set of CO2, CH4, N2O dissolved concentrations and ancillary data in 15 Ecuadorian high-altitude lakes

2023· dataset· en· W4393569807 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Borges Alberto, Steven Bouillon, Gonzalo Chiriboga

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAltitude (triangle)Data setEnvironmental scienceEffects of high altitude on humansPhysical geographyGeographyMeteorologyComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Data-set of the dissolved concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O and ancillary data in 15 lakes located in the northern region of Ecuadorian Andes along an elevational gradient from 2,213 to 4,361 m above sea level, as well as a gradient of lake surface area (0.003 to 6.1 km<sup>2</sup>) and depth (0.9 to 74 m) (Fig. 1). Most lakes were located in the páramos of Salve Facha and Antisana y Mojanda. Sampling was carried out over a period from April 2019 to March 2022, with an inflatable boat approximately in the center of the lake, during day-time only (early morning to late afternoon). Water temperature, specific conductivity, pH, and %O<sub>2</sub> were measured in surface water with a YSI multi-parameter probe (ProPlus). Water for CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O samples was collected with a sampling devise consisting of a 2L polyethylene bottle with the bottom cut and fitted with a silicone tubing at the stopper (Abril et al. 2007). Two borosilicate serum bottles (Weathon) with a volume of 40 ml were filled with the silicone tubing, poisoned with 100 µl of a saturated solution of HgCl<sub>2</sub> and sealed with a butyl stopper and crimped with an aluminium cap. Measurements were made, after over-night equilibration, on an headspace (Weiss 1981) (created by injecting 15 ml of high-purity N<sub>2</sub> into the 40 ml sample bottles), with a gas chromatograph (SRI 8610C) with a flame ionisation detector for CH<sub>4</sub> and electron capture detector for N<sub>2</sub>O calibrated with CH<sub>4</sub>:N<sub>2</sub>O:N<sub>2</sub> gas mixtures (Air Liquide Belgium) with mixing ratios of 1, 10 and 30 ppm for CH<sub>4</sub>, and 0.2, 2.0 and 6.0 ppm for N<sub>2</sub>O. The precision of measurement based on duplicate samples was ±10.9% for CH<sub>4</sub> and ±5.8% for N<sub>2</sub>O. The partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> (pCO<sub>2</sub>) was measured in the field with a Li-Cor Li-820 infra-red gas analyser based on the headspace technique with four 60 ml polypropylene syringes that were filled directly with surface water. The pCO<sub>2</sub> in the atmosphere was measured by injecting ambient air sampled with an additional polypropylene syringe. The Li-Cor Li-820 was calibrated with pure N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>:N<sub>2</sub> gas mixtures (Air Liquide Belgium) of 388, 804, 3,707 and 8,146 ppm. The final pCO<sub>2</sub> value was computed taking into account the partitioning of CO<sub>2</sub> between water and the headspace, as well as equilibrium with HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> (Dickson et al. 2007) using water temperature measured in-situ and after equilibration, and total alkalinity (TA). The precision of pCO<sub>2</sub> measurement was ±5.2%. The CO<sub>2</sub> concentration is expressed as partial pressure in parts per million (ppm) and as dissolved concentration for CH<sub>4</sub> (nmol L<sup>-1</sup>), in accordance with convention in existing topical literature. Variations of N<sub>2</sub>O were modest and concentrations fluctuated around atmospheric equilibrium, so data are presented as percent of saturation level (%N<sub>2</sub>O, where atmospheric equilibrium corresponds to 100%), computed from the global mean N<sub>2</sub>O air mixing ratios given by the Global Monitoring Division (GMD) of the Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/hats/combined/N2O.html), using the Henry’s constant (Weiss and Price 1980). Samples for the stable isotope composition of DIC (δ<sup>13</sup>C-DIC) were collected in 12 ml Exetainer vials (Labco) and poisoned with 50 µL of a saturated solution of HgCl<sub>2</sub>. Prior to the analysis of δ<sup>13</sup>C-DIC, a 2 ml helium headspace was created and 100 µL of phosphoric acid (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 99%) was added in the vial in order to convert CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> to CO<sub>2</sub>. After overnight equilibration, up to 1 mL of the headspace was injected with a gastight syringe into a coupled elemental analyser - IRMS (EA-IRMS, Thermo FlashHT or Carlo Erba EA1110 with DeltaV Advantage). The obtained data were corrected for isotopic equilibration between dissolved and gaseous CO<sub>2</sub> as described by Gillikin and Bouillon (2007). Calibration was performed with certified standards (NBS-19 or IAEA-CO-1, and LSVEC). Reproducibility of measurement based on duplicate injections of samples was typically better than ±0.2 ‰. Water was collected in surface water with a 2L polyethylene bottle. The water filtered through 47 mm diameter GF/F Whatman glass fibber filters was collected and further filtered through polyethersulfone syringe encapsulated filters (0.2 µm porosity) for nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>), nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>), ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), TA, major elements (Na<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>), as well as dissolved silicate (DSi) and Fe, stable isotope composition of O and H of H<sub>2</sub>O (δ<sup>18</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O and δ<sup>2</sup>H-H<sub>2</sub>O) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). An additional water filtration was made on 25 mm diameter GF/F Whatman glass fibber filters for particulate organic carbon (POC) analysis. Samples for NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>, and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> were stored frozen (-20°C) in 50 ml polypropylene vials. NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> were determined with the sulfanilamide colorimetric with the vanadium reduction method (American Public Health Association, 1998), and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> with the dichloroisocyanurate-salicylate-nitroprussiate colorimetric method (Standing committee of Analysts, 1981). Detection limits were 0.3, 0.01, and 0.15 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, respectively. Precisions were ±0.02 µmol L<sup>-1</sup>, ±0.02 µmol L<sup>-1</sup>, and ±0.1 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, respectively. Samples for TA were stored at ambient temperature in polyethylene 55 ml vials and measurements were carried out by open-cell titration with HCl 0.1 mol L<sup>-1</sup> according to Gran (1952), and data quality checked with certified reference material obtained from Andrew Dickson (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, USA), with a typical reproducibility better than ±3 µmol kg<sup>-1</sup>. Samples for δ<sup>18</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O and were δ<sup>2</sup>H-H<sub>2</sub>O stored at ambient temperature in polypropylene 8 ml vials. δ<sup>2</sup>H-H<sub>2</sub>O was measured on H<sub>2</sub> gas derived from a high‐temperature (1,030°C) Cr‐based reactor by automated injections of water using a TriPlus autosampler on an elemental analyzer (Thermo Flash HT/EA; Thermo Finnigan) coupled to a continuous‐flow isotope‐ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage; Thermo Finnigan). δ<sup>18</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O values were measured on a Thermo GasBench II coupled to a Thermo Delta XP IRMS after equilibration with CO<sub>2</sub>. The long-term uncertainty for standard δ<sup>18</sup>O values was ±0.1‰. Samples for major elements were stored at ambient temperature in 20 ml scintillation vials and preserved with 50 μl of HNO<sub>3</sub> (65%). Major elements were measured with inductively coupled plasma MS (ICP-MS; Agilent 7700x) calibrated with the following standards: SRM1640a from National Institute of Standards and Technology, TM-27.3 (lot 0412) and TMRain-04 (lot 0913) from Environment Canada, and SPS-SW2 Batch 130 from Spectrapure Standard. Limit of quantification was 0.5 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> for Na<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>, 1.0 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> for K<sup>+</sup> and 8 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> for DSi. Samples to determine DOC were stored at ambient temperature and in the dark in 40 ml brown borosilicate vials with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coated septa and poisoned with 50 µL of H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (85%), and DOC concentration was determined with a wet oxidation total organic carbon analyzer (IO Analytical Aurora 1030W), with a typical reproducibility better than ±5%. Filters for POC analysis were decarbonated with HCl fumes for 4h and dried before encapsulation into silver cups; POC concentration was analysed on an EA-IRMS (Thermo FlashHT with DeltaV Advantage), with a reproducibility better than ±5%. Data were calibrated with certified (IAEA-600: caffeine) and in-house standards (leucine, tuna muscle tissue) that were previously calibrated versus certified standards. <strong>References</strong> Abril, G., Commarieu, M.-V., Guérin, F., 2007. Enhanced methane oxidation in an estuarine turbidity maximum. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 470-475. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0470 American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, (APHA, 1998). Dickson, A.G., Sabine, C.L., Christian, J.R., 2007. Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements. PICES Special Publication 3, 191 pp., https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1342 Gillikin, D.P., Bouillon, S., 2007. Determination of δ18O of water and δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon using a simple modification of an elemental analyzer – isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA-IRMS): an evaluation, Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 21, 1475-1478, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2968 Gran, G., 1952. Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations Part II, The Analyst, 77, 661-671, https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9527700661. Standing committee of Analysts (1981). Ammonia in waters. Methods for the examination of waters and associated materials. 16 pp (HMSO, 1981). Weiss, R.F., Price, B.A., 1980. Nitrous oxide solubility in water and seawater. Mar. Chem. 8, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9 Weiss, R.F.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsTravaux en français237 207