Editors’ Introduction

What do we, as feminists, need right now—from cinema, from archives, from our communities? How can filmmaking, film festivals, and social movements of the past inspire or befuddle us today? And what is at stake in selecting and presenting archival works by women to create new forms of community? Whether we hold space together in a movie theater or a virtual screening room, we cannot help but draw connections between the unfinished past and the open-ended present. Forging these links is the rallying cry of the feminist film curator. In this tenth-anniversary double issue of Feminist Media Histories, we argue that everyone can contribute to the collective project of archival film curating. Unrealized feminist histories pave the way to unforeseen social possibilities. In that spirit, please join our cabal of feminist archival film curators!We build on the labor, commitment, and imagination of many scholars before us. Writing forgotten women and other marginalized “makers” back into film history has been an energizing endeavor for feminist historiography, evinced in works by Jennifer Bean, Giuliana Bruno, Jane Gaines, Usha Iyer, Debashree Mukherjee, B. Ruby Rich, Shelley Stamp, Jacqueline Najuma Stewart, Patricia White, Yiman Wang, Zhen Zhang, and many others.1 The problem of systemic erasure requires speculative and unorthodox strategies to fill the void, or to “feel” it, as Barbara Zecchi redresses the blight of “archival dispossession” in her videographic essay on Helena Cortesina’s lost silent film Flor de España (1922).2 Saidiya Hartman lovingly fabulates the unwritten lives of radical Black women in her “archive of the exorbitant” in Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments, which has emboldened feminist embraces of “speculative” methodology, exemplified by Allyson Nadia Field’s 2022 FMH double issue.3 The wager of always asking what if?—“often borne out of the necessity of exhaustion—or unsustainability—of other approaches,” as Field remarks, encourages us to “stutter and wander,” Katherine Groo urges, and “respond creatively to the flames and cinders [we] find” in the pockmarked, unfinished archive.4 In fact, “we conceive of incompletion as constitutive of women’s film history at a number of levels,” declare Alix Beeston and Stefan Solomon in their double-duty introduction AND manifesto to Incomplete: The Feminist Possibilities of the Unfinished Film.5 Simply put, feminist futures reside in what’s simultaneously absent and present in the archive.It is the task of the feminist curator to cull those wayward fragments and unleash them onto the emergent, utopian impulses of the present. Feminist curators work in the gaps that feminist archivists and theorists have salvaged from the dustbins of the canon. Together we decide what to save, when, where, and for whom, and how best to frame these tantalizing outtakes for new communities dedicated to raising a ruckus through the resurrection of cinema.Feminist film curating exceeds traditional methods in academic scholarship. Examples run the gamut from digital networks (The Women Film Pioneers Project, Kin Theory, Rise Up!, Edited By, and New Directions in Film Historiography), through archival film festivals (In Visible Colors Remediated, Orphans Film Symposium, and FIC-Silente) and DVD/Blu-ray releases (Kino’s Pioneers: First Women Filmmakers, Pioneers of African-American Cinema, and Cinema’s First Nasty Women), to online compendia (Another Gaze’s Another Screen and Maya Cade’s Black Film Archive) and gallery exhibitions such as HKW’s No Master Territories and BAMPFA’s The Future Is Feminist. These projects often involve speculative forms of academic labor that question university hierarchies and what “counts” as research in the humanities, arts, and social sciences. Toward that end, feminist and queer filmmakers—such as Cecilia Barriga, Zoe Beloff, Zeinabu Irene Davis, Assia Djebar, Zackary Drucker, Tourmaline, Cheryl Dunye, Azza El-Hassan, Su Friedrich, Barbara Hammer, and Karen Pearlman—draw on the remains of the archive to envision lost or impossible counterhistories of cinema and thereby to curate new feminist film futures.To invoke Karl Marx, historians interpret the past; the point, however, is to change it. The twenty essays included in this double issue rally for political change by conjuring excluded archives and creating unruly spaces for their readmission in the present. Many of the essays are cowritten, collaboratively convened, and collectively voiced. They offer practical tools, instructive case studies, radical contexts, and pedagogic provocations for navigating the vast, scattered terrain of marginalized film archives as feminist curators.The issue begins with three peer-reviewed feature articles that propose novel feminist methodologies. Then follow three roundtables, inviting us to partake in crucial conversations with Black feminist filmmakers, silent film curators and musicians, and precarious racialized educators. Up next, a trifecta of short takes imagine lively forms for reincarnating the absent archive. Finally, we include eleven individual case studies of feminist archival film curating.That is the order of our table of contents—now let us tell you more about the methodologies of our madness, which are materially messy and incisively decolonial. Claire Cooley models this commitment in “Gathering Despite Scattering: A Feminist and Decolonial Method of Curation,” which finds inspiration in the Arabic word mutafarraq (to scatter, be scattered) in order to break from colonial curatorial practices rooted in hierarchy and extraction. Cooley thus gathers the scattered archives of Egyptian filmmaker, actress, and musician Bahiga Hafez, weaving them together in a tapestry modeled on the narrative style of Lebanese filmmaker Heiny Srour. For Marísa Hicks-Alcaraz, archives can be reclaimed against colonial scattering, silencing, and erasure through resistant practices of collaborative audiovisual remixing. “Home Movie Remezcla: ‘Doing Good Relations’ as an Approach to Archival Healing” does just that, drawing on Latina feminist practices of multimedia testimony to pursue “transformative resistance and healing from historical oppression and injustice.”Kendra Preston Leonard opts for the metaphor of recuperation to document the lives of three female accompanists—Charlotte Stafford, Mildred Fitzpatrick, and Marie Lucas—and composer Lily Strickland. “Imagining Women’s Archives of Silent Film Music” starts from “a thirst for the unmade,” to invoke Beeston and Solomon’s Incomplete manifesto.6 For Leonard, this is the only possible inroad to theorizing the “gender and loss” that run roughshod over the archive of incomplete, nonextant, and unrealized works by women composers and accompanists. While many of these cue sheets disappeared over a century ago, you wouldn’t expect a film festival from the 1970s to vanish with hardly a trace. The first Black women’s film festival in the world “left a particularly thin archive,” observes Hayley O’Malley in her speculative historiography of the 1976 Sojourner Truth Symposium, published in a previous issue of this journal.7 After sleuthing out and interviewing many of the original artists and participants from the initial event, O’Malley, Field, and filmmaker-curator Monica Freeman organized a screening series and symposium to honor the legacy of 1976. In March 2023, they moderated a roundtable with Ina Archer, Cheryl Chisholm, Jennifer Lawson, O.Funmilayo Makarah, and Yvonne Welbon—we are proud to include an edited transcript of their expansive conversation here.An animating impetus for coediting this journal issue was our own forays into curating as codirectors of Cinema’s First Nasty Women: a 4-disc DVD/Blu-ray set spotlighting feminist slapstick rebellion and queer gender play across ninety-nine films made between 1898 and 1926—all with original, new music. What’s amazed us most about this project has been its contagious spirit of feminist collaboration. So we wrangled twelve of our “nasty women” contributors to participate in a freewheeling Zoom roundtable (moderated by FMH editor Jennifer Bean) about the nitty-gritty of curating, teaching, scoring, producing, and contextualizing the collection.Rounding out our trifecta of feminist roundtables, Apryl Berney and Florencia Marchetti organized a series of conversations about radical pedagogy and precarious labor in higher education in the wake of their retrospective, “Not Your Model Minority: The Art and Activism of Renee Tajima-Peña.” Opening with the provocation, “What pisses you off?,” Berney, Marchetti, Rosanna Alvarez, Soma de Bourbon, and Susana L. Gallardo conjure Tajima-Peña’s radical anger in films such as Who Killed Vincent Chin? (1987), My America…Or, Honk If You Love Buddha (1997), and No Más Bebés (2015). They find archival outlets for simmering affects of rage, anxiety, fear, and depression—but also joy and resistance—across crises spanning anti-Asian violence, lethal pandemic illness, and the adjunctification of academia, while seeking energy and community in the pedagogy of feminist film curating on campus.Frustration “fuels a desire to bring stories and injustices to the realm of the visible,” remarks Marchetti. Reporting from the front lines of archival erasure, Feminist Media Histories journal founder Shelley Stamp attended the 2023 FIAF Symposium in Mexico City, devoted to “Women, Cinema, and Film Archives.” Only 1 percent of filmmakers whose work is collected in FIAF archives worldwide identify as women, notes Stamp, while “a host of unnamed and invisible women,” as one FIAF panelist put it, remain “trapped in our databases.” Kate Saccone offers a provocative rejoinder to the archive’s feminist death trap in “‘Wrath, Witches, and Wonderous Women’: A Curated Program of Lost Films,” in which she delivers on the promise of her title. Drawing on WFPP profiles and avant-garde curation strategies, Saccone concocts a three-screening series (with musical guidance and program notes) of lost silent films directed or written by women from Peru, Croatia, Egypt, China, Mexico, Poland, and the United States. To rewrite film history means daring to “curate differently,” as the vast majority of silent film prints remain irretrievably lost today.Happily, many films do survive—and curating them with a feminist eye does not have to exclude ambivalently feminist works, such as pre-Code Hollywood sex comedies or 1910s Danish tragic melodramas. For Pamela Hutchinson, “Curating Young Cinema” involves breaking down the barriers between screen history and the archival present. Hutchinson demystifies the misnomer of “old cinema” to resurrect a moment when the medium was “bursting with possibilities.” Toward that end, she invites us to “dance like the censor isn’t watching, and watch like film history remains unwritten.”And what is a feminist dance without an enlivening refrain? Say it with us: “2-4-6-8 / History Is Never Straight!” In their “messyfesto,” “Dragging the Archive: A Club Des Femmes Messyfesto,” So Mayer and Club des Femmes revive the energy of their playful curation of Leontine Sagan’s queer cult classic Mädchen in Uniform (1931), accompanied with drag performance by Georgeous Michael, to pull “the erotic play of stockings and nightgowns out of film history’s closet.” Like Mädchen, which was filmed in the grips of Nazi will-to-power and homophobic whiplash in late Weimar Germany, queer feminist film curation responds to transphobic neofascism with lesbian camp, embodied queer theory, and collective provocations to imagine otherwise.We can always imagine otherwise, but from where shall we do so? More than anything, fantasy is “a setting for desire,” as Linda Williams reminds us in her pivotal essay on body genres.8 Enter feminist elsewheres: an International Women’s Film Seminar in Berlin that celebrated its fiftieth anniversary in October 2023. Cocurators Elena Baumeister, Fiona Berg, Charlotte S. Eitelbach, Sophie Holzberger, and Arisa Purkpong reflect on “feminist elsewheres. A Making(-)Of Three Festivals in the Making” across its recurring iterations in 1973, 1997, and 2023. They theorize and thereby decenter the meaning of “elsewhere” as a plurality of “not yet fulfilled promises” by interrogating what (if anything—if not everything) has changed since 1973 and 1997 in the world of collective feminist filmmaking. Dayna McLeod, Ylenia Olibet, and Alanna Thain locate that change in an independent artist-run center in Montreal “dedicated to the promotion of videos created by women (in its most inclusive definition).” Their cowritten multimedia essay, “Curation as the Cure for the Archive: Groupe Intervention Video’s Vidéos des Femmes dans le Parc,” elaborates on GIV’s feminist curatorial practices to fuse together the archive and everyday life, converging on their annual event that exhibits feminist video art and helps cement community in times of loss, illness, and financial precarity.Or worse: snatched from the hellmouth of war and colonial occupation, archives safeguard fragile documents that testify to everyday resistance against unending subjugation. In those cases, their very survival demands nimble tactics in film restoration. Mathilde Rouxel presents the Jocelyn Saab Project, devoted to “Restoring and Curating Jocelyne Saab’s Cinema of Middle East Struggle,” spanning twenty documentaries that Saab shot on 16 mm in Lebanon, Egypt, Morocco, and Algeria from 1974 to 1989. “A collective restoration process to reclaim the memory of history,” carried out autonomously in Beirut, the project’s cache of Saab’s political cinema can now be programmed all around the world. But what do you do when the object of archival repatriation is implicated in the very structures of violence and oppression that simultaneously exclude its visibility? Regina Longo thoughtfully navigates this enigma in her nuanced case study of Albania’s first woman filmmaker, “Complicating Legacies: Restoring and Re-releasing the Films of Xhanfise Keko.” Longo reflects on her own role as an archivist and curator of the Albanian Cinema Project to redress silences about the atrocities of the country’s brutal dictatorship. As she argues, aesthetic commitment does not always align with historical reality when restoring and curating the works of an important overlooked female filmmaker.Feminist archives are nothing if not messy and contradictory. Sometimes it is a feminist gesture in itself to provide context for the significance of those archives to ongoing struggles today. Other times, feminist archives wear their political commitments on their sleeve (or their emulsion, if you’ll indulge the mixed metaphor). This was precisely the case for Freude, a Bay Area filmmaker and distributor of 1960s–1970s independent and experimental women’s cinema. Films about sexual liberation and sexuality were among the most popular subjects in her catalog, observe Tanya Zimbardo and Antonella Bonfanti in their evocative case study, “Serious Business: Freude and Feminist Film Distribution.” Gabriela Yepes-Rossel similarly unsettles dominant paradigms of Peruvian film historiography in “Curating Disruption: Reflections from Peru on Feminist Film Archiving.” Inspired by the Women Film Pioneers Project, Yepes-Rossel launched and curated Rebels and Braves (1913–2019), the first exhibition to establish the extensive participation of women in the history of Peruvian film production. She thoughtfully recounts her archival work, selection criteria, and the euphoric sense of community and possibility that emerged at the event.How do we choose what to save, especially when that choice imperils the survival of our own experiences and collective memories? Laura López Casado chronicles the formation and activity of Eskelera Karakola (EKKA), a self-organized feminist social center in Madrid, Spain—whose “accidental archives” were discovered in a closet in 2022. “Building a Feminist and Activist Archive: Challenges, Discussions, and Reflections” hashes out the debates that ensued about how and where to preserve the miniDV tapes, VHS cassettes, DVDs, and other print materials documenting the activist history of the center. Out of the closet and into the Lesbian Herstory Archives in lesbian feature film of the a from to the Film de and present the film as a for queer collective in of the and the of Lesbian Cinema in As they strategies of are what queer art curating can many often as as archival or at digital networks of and in of of Women’s Cinema in The country’s first feminist is devoted to curating films made by women across and social in vast catalog, in the between the digital and the of it the virtual to a queer in was “left by the for a screening of event to to the archival in curating cinema. to 2023, when discovered the the first of film and History through the and Curating on the meaning of in the of and offers into how archival practices to all our that spirit, we on feminist to the of curators and join us in a to and film history through the liberation of and To curate from the archive is to decide whose history in the present.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.