MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393712024 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4439231

Publication rate and consistency of registered trials of motor-based stroke rehabilitation

2021· dataset· en· W4393712024 sur OpenAlexaff
Raabeae Aryan, David Jagroop, Cynthia J. Danells, Gabriela Rozanski, Janelle Unger, Andrew H. Huntley, Avril Mansfield

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Établissements canadiensWestern UniversityUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConsistency (knowledge bases)Physical medicine and rehabilitationRehabilitationStroke (engine)PsychologyMedicinePhysical therapyComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Table e1 - Eligible records A list of registered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the following criteria: RCTs of motor-based interventions in individuals with stroke (including transient ischemic attack); Started on or after 1 July 2005; Completed before 1 April 2017 (actual or expected end date); Included human adult participants (≥18 years old); Included at least one outcome (primary or secondary) related to motor control, mobility, or physical functioning and performance of upper and/or lower extremities or the body as a whole; and Registered in English. This list was obtained by searching the following registries between 23 November 2017 and 22 February 2018: the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov (USA), Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Clinical Research Information Service (Republic of Korea), Clinical Trial Registry of India, Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials, European Union Clinical Trials Register, German Clinical Trials Register, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry (UK), Center for Clinical Trials-Japan Medical Association, University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trial Registry (Japan), Thai Clinical Trials Registry, Netherlands Trials Registry, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, Peruvian Clinical Trials Registry, and Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry. Variable definitions UIN: Unified identification number (obtained from the trial registry) Status: whether or not a peer-reviewed publication reporting the trial findings for the primary outcome/outcome was found Paper available: a publication reporting the trial findings for the primary outcome/objective was found Paper available (not English): a publication, published in a language other than English, reporting the trial findings for the primary outcome/objective was found Secondary paper available: a publication reporting study findings is available, but not for the primary objectives/outcome Results available: trial findings for the primary objective/outcome are available in a non-peer reviewed format (e.g., conference publication, non-peer reviewed journal, or uploaded to the trial registry) Discontinued: the trial registry record indicates that the trial was discontinued, so no publication is expected No paper/results: none of the above apply Source: database or method we used to find the publication reporting the trial findings for the primary objective/outcome Pubmed: the publication was found by searching for the UIN in Pubmed EMBASE/OVID: the publication was found by searching for the UIN in Embase or OVID Medline Google Scholar: the publication was found by searching for the UIN in Google Scholar Registry: the publication was listed in the trial registry Internet: the publication was found by a superficial internet search for the UIN Protocol: the publication was found through a cited reference search for the published protocol Author: the publication was found by contacting the trial investigators Other: the publication was found by some other means None: no publication reporting the trial findings for the primary objective/outcome was found Table e2 - Published papers consistency The subset of trials from Table e1 where an English-language publication reporting the trial findings for the primary objective/outcome was found. Variable definitions UIN: Unified identification number (obtained from the trial registry) DOI: digital objective identifier of the publication First_author: last name of the first author of the publication Year: year of the publication Journal: journal of the publication (abbreviated journal names are used, where available) Reg_Trial_End_Date: end date of the trial, as stated in the trial registry (format DD-MMM-YY) Date_Submitted: date when the paper was submitted to the journal for publication (where available; format: DD-MMM-YY) Time_To_Submit: difference, in days, between Reg_Trial_End_Date and Date_Submitted Date_Published: date when the paper was published, either online or in print, whichever is earlier (format: DD-MMM-YY) Time_To_Publish: difference, in days, between Reg_Trial_End_Date and Time_To_Publish UIN_Paper_Location: location of the UIN in the publication Reg_Pilot: whether the trial was defined as a pilot or feasibility study in the registry record (0=no, 1=yes) Paper_Pilot: whether the trial was defined as a pilot or feasibility study in the publication (0=no, 1=yes) Consistency_pilot: whether Reg_Pilot = Paper_Pilot (0=no, 1=yes) Consistency_Primary_Objective: whether the trial registry record and publication were consistent in terms of the primary objective (0=no, 1=yes) Consistency_Primary_Outcome: whether the trial registry record and publication were consistent in terms of the primary outcome (0=no, 1=yes) Target_N: target sample size, as indicated in the trial registry record Paper_N: number of participants recruited to the study, as indicated in the publication Consistency_N: whether the trial registry record and publication were consistent in terms of the sample size (i.e., Paper_N is within +/-10% of Target_N; 0=no, 1=yes) N_direction: for those trials that were inconsistent in terms of the sample size, whether Paper_N was less than (Under) or more then (Over) Target_N Eligibility_Consistency: whether the trial registry record and publication were consistent in terms of the eligibility criteria UIN_in_paper: the UIN that was included in the paper, exactly as it was published UIN_consistency: whether UIN = UIN_in_paper (0=no, 1=yes) Reg_Type: whether the trial was registered before recruiting the first participant (Prospective), after recruiting the first participant but before the trial was completed (Retro - pre-completion), or after the trial was completed (Retro - post-completion) Table e3 - Inconsistency details The subset of trials from Table e2 where the trial registry record and publication were inconsistent on only one of the criteria examined. This table provides further details of these inconsistencies, and details of any explanations for changes to the protocol since registration, if available.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,268
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,744
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesMétarecherche
DomaineSignal candidat: Présentation des résultats · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,732
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,903

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,2680,744
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0070,009
Bibliométrie0,0410,054
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0110,010
Science ouverte0,0040,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0390,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
DomainePrésentation des résultats
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→Travaux en français237 207→