MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393740812 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7682788

cb-oura-1.0 : Generic climate scenarios from bias-adjusted CMIP5 global models

2018· dataset· en· W4393740812 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Travis Logan, B. Gauvin St-Denis, Pascal Bourgault

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueClimate variability and models
Établissements canadiensOuranos
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClimate simulationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyClimate modelClimate changeEconometricsMeteorologyComputer scienceGeographyMathematicsGeologyOceanography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Context The need to adapt to climate change is present in a growing number of fields, leading to an increase in the demand for climate scenarios for often interrelated sectors of activity. In order to meet this growing demand and to ensure the availability of climate scenarios responding to numerous vulnerability, impact, and adaptation (VIA) studies, Ouranos is working to create a set of operational multipurpose climate scenarios. The initial version of “Scénarios Génériques” (generic scenarios, acronym cb-oura-1.0) is used mainly in Ouranos’ work to provide a consistent image of the changing climate over the North East of North America, principally the province of Québec. Cb-oura-1.0 was produced in 2016 by downscaling and bias-adjusting a selection of global climate model simulations available through the CMIP5 program. Climate simulations Climate simulations in the ensemble Modeling center Acronym Model RCP Status* College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University GCESS BNU-ESM 4.5 s 8.5 s Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis CCCMA CanESM2 4.5 a 8.5 s Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per I Cambiamenti Climatici CMCC CMCC-CMS 4.5 a 8.5 s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) and Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australia CSIRO-BOM ACCESS1.3 4.5 s 8.5 a Institute for Numerical Mathematics INM INM-CM4 4.5 s 8.5 a Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace IPSL IPSL-CM5A-LR 4.5 a 8.5 s IPSL-CM5B-LR 4.5 s 8.5 s Met Office Hadley Centre MOHC HadGem2 4.5 s 8.5 s Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie (Max Planck Institute for Meteorology) MPI-M MPI-ESM 4.5 s 8.5 s Norwegian Climate Centre NCC NorESM 4.5 a 8.5 s NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory NOAA-GFDL GFDL-ESM2M 4.5 s 8.5 s From the complete ensemble of RCP 4.5 and 8.5 driven CMIP5 climate simulations, a selection of 22 simulations (11 per RCP) was made using a clustering ensemble reduction methodology (Casajus et al. 2016). This objective selection method identifies a reduced number of simulations that best represent the overall ensemble. Input criteria for the reduction were the monthly changes between the present (1981-2010) and two future horizons (2041-2070 and 2071-2100), at 15 regions distributed across Canada, for three variables (mean daily maximum temperature, mean daily minimum temperature and total precipitation). An initial selection of 16 simulations shows a distribution projected changes for the 12 (months) x 2 (horizons) x 15 (regions) x 3 (variables) indices that is not statistically different from the complete ensemble. A small number of simulations were subsequently added to have a complete set with both RCPs represented equally (11 members for each emission scenario). Reference dataset The bias-adjustment reference (or target) is a gridded observation dataset produced by Natural Resources Canada (McKenney et al., 2011; et Hutchinson et al. ,2009). It uses the ANUSPLIN interpolation method over station observations to derive daily grids of minimum and maximum temperature, as well as total precipitation for the Canadian landmass. The grid has a resolution of 10 km x 10 km and cover the time period from 1950 to 2013. As this dataset is not available over the United States, it was merged with another observation interpolation dataset produced by Livneh et al. (2015) in order to enable the production of bias-corrected climate scenarios covering a portion of the northern United States. Coverage The final version of this dataset covers a region covering the Atlantic provinces, Québec, Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan and part of the northern United States: From 120°W to 54°W and from 40°N to 62°N. It contains the daily minimum temperature, daily maximum temperature and daily precipitation flux, covering the period 1950 to 2100. Bias-adjustment The global simulations where downscaled to the reference grid using bilinear interpolation and then bias-adjusted with a 1-D quantile mapping method, as described by Gennaretti et al. (2015). A moving window of 31 days was used to adjust each day of the year, using 50 quantiles to define the statistical distributions to match. The long-term linear trends of the temperature variables were preserved explicitly. Climate indicators This dataset is used to in the first versions (up to 1.3) of Ouranos’ Climate Portraits website. A selection of 26 seasonal and annual climate indicators were computed from the daily scenarios, using the xclim software package (Logan et al. 2022). The "virtual indicator module" used for the computation is made available here in the "indicators.yml" file. On the Climate Portraits website, the information is presented from three aspects: spatial, temporal and summary. This repository stores the reduced ensemble data as shown on the website. Filenames are constructed as "{aspect}_{indicator}_{season}.nc". Maps (files "spatial_*") : Climate indicators for each bias-adjusted climate simulation and for a given RCP emission scenario are averaged over 30-year horizons. Ensemble percentiles are computed in order to summarize climate model uncertainty. In particular the 10, 25, 50, 75 and 90th percentiles over the 11 members are calculated for each RCP. Timeseries (files "temporal_*") : Climate indicators for each bias-adjusted simulation are averaged spatially over each region for every time step (annual or seasonal). The ensemble statistics are computed by first pooling all regional average values for the 11 members using within a centred 30-year window and then calculating percentile values (same as above) on the pooled data. Summary (files "summary_*") : The indicators are averaged over each region and then over 30-year horizons. The ensemble statistics (same as above) are then computed. In versions 2.x of the app, this data will be presented as "CMIP5". Data availability This repository stores the climate indicator ensemble statistics as shown on the Climate Portraits website and described above. The complete daily dataset is too large for this platform. The complete daily dataset is available through the public THREDDS server of the PAVICS platform maintained by Ouranos. This data might be removed in the future. When this is the case, please contact us for data requests. https://pavics.ouranos.ca/twitcher/ows/proxy/thredds/catalog/datasets/simulations/bias_adjusted/cmip5/ouranos/cb-oura-1.0/catalog.html The annual and season indicators of the Climate Portraits website are available on the same server, along with a few more indicators not shown on the app. https://pavics.ouranos.ca/twitcher/ows/proxy/thredds/catalog/birdhouse/ouranos/portraits-clim-1.3/catalog.html Terms of use: Use of this dataset should be acknowledged as 'Data produced and provided by the Ouranos Consortium on Regional Climatology and Adaptation to Climate Change'. Furthermore, the modeling groups from which the bias-adjusted climate scenarios were constructed must also be acknowledged, please refer to: The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/citation.html.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,249
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,496

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,176 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetClimate variability and models→Travaux en français237 207→