Abstract CT238: Associations of ctDNA levels during neoadjuvant treatment with pathological response in patients with resectable NSCLC from the phase 3 AEGEAN trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: In AEGEAN, perioperative durvalumab (D) + neoadjuvant (neoadj) chemotherapy (CT) significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (primary endpoints), and major pathological response (MPR; key secondary endpoint), with manageable safety vs neoadj CT alone in patients with resectable NSCLC. We report exploratory ctDNA analyses during neoadj treatment (Tx) and associations of ctDNA dynamics and clearance with pathological response, including pCR, MPR and percentage residual viable tumor (%RVT). Methods: AEGEAN is a double-blind placebo (PBO)-controlled study (NCT03800134). Adults with Tx-naïve resectable NSCLC (stage II-IIIB[N2]; AJCC 8th ed) were randomized (1:1) to receive neoadj CT + D or PBO IV (Q3W, 4 cycles) prior to surgery (Sx), followed by D or PBO IV (Q4W, 12 cycles), respectively, after Sx. Evaluable resected samples from patients in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (patients without known EGFR/ALK aberrations) were assessed centrally for %RVT and determination of pCR (absence of any RVT in resection specimen, including primary tumor and all sampled lymph nodes) and MPR (≤10% RVT in primary tumor) per IASLC recommendations. Plasma samples were collected prior to each neoadj Tx cycle (at baseline [BL], C2D1, C3D1, and C4D1) and before Sx. ctDNA analysis was performed using patient-specific, tumor-informed assays, following identification of mutations in Tx-naïve, diagnostic biopsies by whole exome sequencing. ctDNA variant allele fractions (VAFs; mutant sequences as a % of total sequence reads at ctDNA panel sites) and dynamics, including ctDNA clearance, were assessed during neoadj Tx, and their potential associations with pCR, MPR, or %RVT were evaluated. Results: ctDNA was evaluated in 831 samples from 186 patients (D arm, n=90; PBO arm, n=96) in the mITT population from the interim pCR analysis cohort (n=402). ctDNA dynamics were assessed during neoadj Tx in relation to whether patients had a pathological response at surgery; patients without surgery were designated as non-responders. BL VAF levels were not significantly different between patients who had tumors with vs without pCR (D arm, P=0.09; PBO arm, P=0.7) or MPR (D arm, P=0.4; PBO arm, P=0.8); however, on-Tx VAF levels were significantly lower in the D arm from C2D1 onwards in patients with vs without pCR (P≤0.001) or MPR (P≤0.01) and in the PBO arm from C3D1 for pCR (P≤0.003) or C2D1 for MPR (P≤0.002). %RVT was significantly lower in patients with vs without ctDNA clearance from C2D1 onwards in the D arm (median, <5% vs ≥30%, P≤0.01) and from C3D1 onwards in the PBO arm (median, 10% vs ≥50%, P≤0.0004). Conclusions: In AEGEAN, reduced VAF levels during neoadj Tx appeared associated with pCR or MPR. Patients in whom ctDNA clearance was observed tended to have a lower %RVT, from C2D1 in the D arm and from C3D1 in the PBO arm. Citation Format: Davina Gale, Zhou Zhu, Zhongwu Lai, Martin Reck, David Harpole, Janis M. Taube, Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Maximilian Hochmair, Thomas Winder, László Urbán, Jeronimo Rodriguez-Cid, Quincy Chu, Jamie Chaft, Ross Stewart, Darren Hodgson, Gary J. Doherty, John V. Heymach. Associations of ctDNA levels during neoadjuvant treatment with pathological response in patients with resectable NSCLC from the phase 3 AEGEAN trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT238.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».