Abstract CT019: Biological mechanisms underlying objective responses in recurrent GBM patients treated with sequential bortezomib and temozolomide: An interim analysis of NCT03643549 Phase IB/II trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) has dismal prognosis, where median survival is approximately 12 months for patients harboring unmethylated O6−methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter (uMGMT) due to temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy resistance. In preclinical studies, we showed that sequential administration of bortezomib (BTZ) prior to TMZ depleted MGMT protein, abrogated autophagic flux and sensitized uMGMT GBM cells to TMZ. Thus, a phase I/II was launched to investigate clinical benefit. An interim analysis based on Simon´s MinMax design (where at least 2 patients should show clinical benefit amongst the first 15 evaluable patients) would allow the study to continue to full recruitment. Clinical benefit, was defined by progression free survival and or objective radiological complete (CR), partial (PR) responses or stable disease (SD) based on RANO criteria at 6 months and 1-year follow-up. This study aimed to identify the biological mechanisms underlying the objective responses in the initial 15 recurrent GBM patients treated in this trial. Methods: Adult recurrent GBM patients with uMGMT promoter, progressing ≥12 weeks after radiotherapy, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70 and with measurable lesions were enrolled. They received BTZ 1.3mg/m2 IV on days 1,4,7, during each 4-week cycle starting on day 3 with per oral TMZ at 200mg/m2 5 days/week. The sample size was powered for n=63 patients. Quantitative LC-MS/MS was used to identify novel biomarkers that correlate with objective treatment responses by determining proteomic changes in plasma collected on days 1,4,7,11,15 and 22 during first cycle of treatment. Targeted sequencing of 360 cancer genes and whole exome sequencing (WES) of tumor DNA were conducted to identify associated molecular genetic changes. Results: The 15 patients had median age 52 yrs (range 25-62 yrs), 10 male and 5 female treated at Haukeland University Hospital in Norway. Median KPS was 90 (70-100) and median NANO score was 1 (0-7). 27% (n=4/15) of patients obtained objective radiological responses, where 2/4 (50%) obtained PR and 2/4 (50%) had SD. LC-MS/MS revealed significantly increased (p<0.05) levels of proteins important for regulation of cell death and apoptosis (ADAMTS13, HPR, HBD, CLU and APOE) in objective responders compared to the rest of the patients. Sequential BTZ+ TMZ therapy was safe, tolerated and platelet nadirs consistently normalized by day 22 of each cycle. Proteins associated with platelet activation, aggregation and degranulation (ACTN1, ITGB3, PLEK, PPBP, THBS1, TF, TAGLN2, TLN1, PFN1, VCL and FERMT3) were significantly upregulated (1.6-4.8 fold, p<0.05) on day 15 and 22 compared to baseline in patient plasma. Preliminary analysis of sequencing data identified EGFR gain-of-function mutation in 3 of the 4 responder patients; potentially distinguishing this as a molecular biomarker for the objective treatment responders. Conclusion: Sequential BTZ+TMZ therapy is safe and effective as indicated by objective radiological response. Activation of tumor cell death and apoptosis pathways was observed specifically in objective responders. The interim criteria were fulfilled as 4 amongst the first 15 patients showed clinical benefit. The study is currently recruiting. Citation Format: Mohummad Aminur Rahman, Dorota Goplen, Andreas Waha, Leif Oltedal, Judit Haasz, Surendra Kumar, Even Birkeland, Hrvoje Miletic, Frode Selheim, Martha Chekenya. Biological mechanisms underlying objective responses in recurrent GBM patients treated with sequential bortezomib and temozolomide: An interim analysis of NCT03643549 Phase IB/II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT019.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».