MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4393988979 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-ng07

Abstract NG07: Association between somatic microsatellite instability, hypermutation status, and specific T cell subsets in colorectal cancer tumors

2024· article· en· W4393988979 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Claire E. Thomas, Yasutoshi Takashima, Tomotaka Ugai, Daniel D. Buchanan, Conghui Qu, Li Hsu, Andressa Dias Costa, S Gallinger, Robert C. Grant, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Sushma Thomas, Robert S. Steinfelder, Shuji Ogino, Amanda I. Phipps, Jonathan A. Nowak, Ulrike Peters

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMicrosatellite instabilitySomatic hypermutationColorectal cancerCancerSomatic cellGermline mutationMedicineBiologyOncologyCancer researchGeneticsMicrosatelliteMutationGeneB cellAllele

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a critical public health concern as the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer death globally. CRC is a heterogeneous disease with many different mechanisms and molecular subtypes. Around 15% of sporadic CRCs are classified as exhibiting high microsatellite instability (MSI-high) due to deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR). In the presence of MSI-high, colorectal tumors accumulate somatic mutations, resulting in high neoantigen burden, which, in turn, elicits a strong T cell response. Several previous studies have shown that MSI-high status is associated with overall levels of T cell infiltration in CRC and, specifically, with CD45RO+ T cell density. However, many studies have measured T cell densities using single-plex immunohistochemistry assays of individual T cell markers, which fail to capture the complexity of the T cell response in tumors, and the contributions of different T cell subsets. Using a multiplex immunofluorescence panel, we aimed to characterize the composition of the T cell response in CRC tumors in relation to MSI-high and hypermutation status in CRC. Methods: This study was conducted within a subset of participants from three well-characterized epidemiologic studies included in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO): the Ontario Family Colon Cancer Registry (OFCCR), the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). In a total of N=637 participants with CRC, we profiled the in-situ T cell landscape of CRC using digital imaging, machine learning, and a multiplexed immunofluorescence panel. Our customized 9-plex panel included antibodies directed against CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO, FOXP3, and MKI67, as well as a pan-cytokeratin antibody to identify tumor/epithelial cells and nuclear DAPI (4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) stain. Assays were conducted using tissue microarrays (TMAs) where all slides were sent to Dana Farber Cancer Institute for analysis. In brief, core selection from donor FFPE blocks was guided by pathologist review of H&E-stained slides. For each CRC case, TMA blocks have 2-4 cores (0.6 mm) from tumor areas. T cell immune microenvironment is assessed for each tumor histologically using a multispectral imaging platform (PerkinElmer Vectra 3.0) for multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF), where TMAs are stained with all markers concurrently and imaged. With pathologist supervision, a machine learning algorithm segmented tissue into epithelial and stromal area regions as well as phenotyped individual cells. The mIF panel has been validated against traditional chromogenic IHC. Based on these markers, we quantified counts and densities of naive, memory, and regulatory subsets of helper (CD3+CD4+) and cytotoxic (CD3+CD8+) T cells, and looked separately at these subsets within epithelial and stromal tissue, resulting in 12 unique subsets. Microsatellite instability and hypermutation status were determined from one of two targeted sequencing panels that included either 205 or 298 genes. MSI status was called using mSINGS. Hypermutation status was defined by plotting point mutations for all samples and observing different peaks, separately by panel. The minimum value between the two peaks was 23 and 26 point mutations per sample, respectively, which were used as cut-points. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between MSI/hypermutation status with quantiles of specific T cell densities in CRC. As an alternative approach where counts were modeled directly, we used negative binomial count models with an offset term for area. Ordinal logistic regression either used quartiles or tertiles of T cell densities as the outcome, where different subsets were assessed for zero-inflation considering both epithelial and stromal tissue, so the same subset used the same categorization in each tissue. Subsets with less than 25% zero counts were divided into quartiles, subsets with greater than 25% zero counts into tertiles. Study-specific quantile cut points were used to limit potential batch effects across TMAs. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and study, and p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the false discovery rate method for 12 independent tests. Results: Among 637 CRC tumors with targeted tumor sequencing and T cell immune profile available, 107 were classified as MSI-high, and 106 were classified as hypermutated. 98 tumors were both MSI-high and hypermutated. Compared to tumors with low microsatellite instability (MSI-low) or microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors, MSI-high tumors were strongly associated (ORs around 2 or higher) with higher T cell densities for all epithelial area CD3+CD4+, epithelial area CD3+CD8+, and stromal area CD3+CD8+ T cells (adjusted p-values <0.001). Compared to MSI-low/MSS tumors, MSI-high tumors had 3 times the odds of greater quantile of epithelial area CD3+CD8+ subsets defined as naive, memory, and regulatory [OR= 3.2 95% CI (2.14, 4.79), OR=3.19 (2.15, 4.72), OR=3.31 (2.20, 4.97), respectively]. MSI-high tumors were not associated with higher densities of stromal area CD3+CD4+ naive, memory, or regulatory cells. Effect estimates for hypermutation status showed consistent results and the same conclusions as MSI. Effect estimates from negative binomial models showed consistent findings with the ordinal logistic results presented. Conclusions: While it is well known that T cells overall are strongly associated with MSI status in CRC, the present study improves our understanding of what specific T cell subsets in what location in the tumor are associated with MSI and hypermutation status. Additionally, given the high level of T cell infiltration in MSI-high/dMMR tumors, these tumors are more likely to respond favorably to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A more granular understanding of specific T cell subsets that are associated with these tumor phenotypes may improve our understanding of underlying biology and help inform targeted immunotherapy treatment decision-making for the MSI-high/dMMR CRC subtype. In future work we aim to examine increasing mutation frequency as a continuous variable and with more specific categorization of mutation frequency than binary cut-points in association with T cell profile. Citation Format: Claire Elizabeth Thomas, Yasutoshi Takashima, Tomotaka Ugai, Daniel D. Buchanan, Conghui Qu, Li Hsu, Andressa Dias Costa, Stephen Gallinger, Robert C. Grant, Jeroen R. Huyghe, Sushma S. Thomas, Robert S. Steinfelder, Shuji Ogino, Amanda I. Phipps, Jonathan A. Nowak, Ulrike Peters. Association between somatic microsatellite instability, hypermutation status, and specific T cell subsets in colorectal cancer tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr NG07.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,062
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Research→Même sujetGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→Travaux en français237 207→