MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4394595666 · doi:10.1353/sss.2022.a923219

Remembering Joe: In Memoriam: Joseph McLellan, September 27, 1945–November 30, 2021

2022· article· en· W4394595666 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marc Kuly, Jessica Senehi

Notice bibliographique

RevueStorytelling Self Society · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCritical Race Theory in Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyArtHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Remembering JoeIn Memoriam: Joseph McLellan, September 27, 1945–November 30, 2021 Marc Kuly (bio) and Jessica Senehi (bio) Marc Kuly: The first story I ever heard Joe McLellan tell was about the sound of a heartbeat. He had been invited to tell stories to students at the school where I taught. In the midst of a mass of middle schoolers, Joe took out his drum and began to play it softly as he told his story. The students went silent and listened as he explained that the drum echoed the sound of a mother's heartbeat and that all of us are united by the memory of that sound. I heard Joe tell that story many more times over the years, and every time he told it, it drew a tear of joy from my eye. Joe's stories were diverse. They could be about the Anishinabe spirit Nanabosho, they could be about Hutterite conscientious objectors, or they could come from his own experiences growing up different. His delivery was equally diverse. Sometimes he was nearly silent, whispering words. Other times he was exuberant, punctuating stories with shrieks and shouts. It was as if the stories he told lived out into the world through him. When he told stories from his own childhood, there were times when I could see him as a boy, right there, up on stage. But across his diverse repertoire and delivery, there was a unifying thread. Joe's telling centered on revealing our common humanity. Just like the sound of his drum, his stories reminded us of the beating heart, equal parts vulnerable and strong, that we all share. Each in its own way, his stories persuaded listeners to rekindle their kindness toward themselves and others. [End Page 279] Joe was a mentor to me. I didn't ask him to be one. In fact, I never asked Joe to do anything for me, except for one time. I had been trying to use storytelling in my classrooms for most of my career and, by good fortune, was given a chance to coordinate a day-long workshop on storytelling for teachers from across our province. It was high stakes because it marked a turn toward the art and heart of teaching. In years past these workshops had focused on leadership strategy and had featured big name speakers from think tanks and universities. I asked Joe for advice. By the end of the conversation, he had reassured me of the power of storytelling and offered to share the burden of bringing it to this event. That day was magic. I did a small part, sharing stories of storytelling in my classroom. But Joe did the rest. He told a story that lasted the whole day. Of course, there were breaks where we all did activities and tried out different storytelling approaches he led us through, but by the end of the day, we had all become characters in the overall story he was telling. Through laughter, so much laughter, and the kind of tears that show up when you recognize that you aren't alone, he brought everyone in the room together. At the end of the day, I was exhausted. The stress of living up to the expectations of the organization that hosted the workshop and my real, but unfounded worries about whether storytelling would be received by this group had weighed on me. I was standing with one of Joe's friends, another wonderfully caring storytelling mentor, Jamie Oliviero, who had closed out the event. We were in front of a window in the conference center where the workshop was held, looking out over the expanse of Lake Winnipeg as the sun set. Joe walked up behind me, put his hand softly on my shoulder, shared a look with Jamie, and said, "good work, our boy." That memory is a treasure. After delivering a masterpiece, he chose to not only congratulate me, but to let me know I was part of a family of storytelling. Just like so many of his stories did, he let me know I was not alone. I am not the only person that Joe invited into the family...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,737
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueStorytelling Self SocietyMême sujetCritical Race Theory in EducationTravaux en français237 207