MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4394606910 · doi:10.1353/nai.2024.a924413

Reconciliation and Indigenous Justice: A Search for Ways Forward by David Milward (review)

2024· article· en· W4394606910 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gillian Calder

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCambodian History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousEconomic JusticeCriminologySociologyPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsLawPhilosophyBiologyEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Reconciliation and Indigenous Justice: A Search for Ways Forward by David Milward Gillian Calder (bio) Reconciliation and Indigenous Justice: A Search for Ways Forward by David Milward Fernwood Publishing, 2022 THIS IS AN IMPORTANT BOOK, not just in the story it tells but also in the way it tells that story. It is an invaluable resource for all those living with or learning about the complicated dimensions of reconciliation, Indigenous justice, prison abolition, intersocietal legal orders, ethics and morality, restorative programming, spirituality, principles of sentencing, and the importance of a search for ways forward. It takes on many of the most difficult issues that we face as a shared society, and it does so with grace, careful research, and a sense of hope. The book's power rests in the clear connection it draws between the experience of residential schools and the grave problem of overincarceration of Indigenous Peoples in Canada today. It troubles the ways that standard punitive policies of the Canadian state continue to be applied to Indigenous peoples living with the social legacies and enduring harms of residential schools; and then it offers concrete means to repair relationships, to further harmony in the context of conflict, to rethink approaches to punishment, and to reimagine accountability, responsibility and safety. Part of what enables David Milward to accomplish his aims is the decision he makes to approach the issues and questions of reconciliation as a "Word Warrior." Drawn from the work of Anishinaabe political scientist Dale Turner,1 Word Warriors are academically trained Indigenous philosophers who act as bridges and advocates for Indigenous people within a democratic state. They are people with the capacity to move between languages, across dichotomies, and within ways of thinking about the world. As Inuvialuit legal scholar Gordon Christie has written, Word Warriors must be able to take up, deconstruct, and continue to resist colonialism—but they are also skilled in their ability to engage the legal and political discourses of the state.2 Milward responds to those who see the work of change as only possible through the realm of direct action by offering that it is as a Word Warrior that he is likely to be the most persuasive within corridors of power; to effect change in the realm of criminal justice policy is to align—he argues—Canadian self-interest with Indigenous aspirations. [End Page 140] Embracing words as effective tools of social justice, Milward shows how residential schools, through their legacies of abuse, planted the seeds of intergenerational trauma in Indigenous communities. He then painstakingly follows each sprout through case law where he teases out judicial recognition of residential school factors that have played a role in the accused's conflict with the justice system and ultimately in overincarceration. And while it is painful, he moves through questions of substance use, mental health, racism, cultural losses, deficient parenting, intimate partner violence, sexual abuse, poverty, family policing, and the intersections that coexist. He then offers law as remedy: as a scythe in a garden full of weeds, a sprinkler for parched soil, and fertilizer for ideas that need more nurturing to break the surface. Cognizant that hope can be fleeting, Milward concludes by drawing a narrative of reconciliation, resurgence, and revitalization into the text. He shows what might grow from investment in community, from critical programming both inside and outside of prison, and from a principled reallocation of resources. He uses his Word Warrior toolkit to bridge colonial laws to Indigenous legal orders: highlighting questions of safety, responsibility, family relations, and care. And ultimately, with a reminder that words are sometimes the most powerful tools available, he leaves his readers with some reasoned optimism and a way forward. Gillian Calder GILLIAN CALDER is professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Victoria. Notes 1. Dale Turner, This Is Not a Peace Pipe: Towards a Critical Indigenous Philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006). 2. Gordon Christie, "Response to This Is Not a Peace Pipe: Towards a Critical Indigenous Philosophy by Dale Turner," APA Newsletter 10, no. 2 (2011). Copyright © 2024 Regents of the University of Minnesota

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,597
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,389
Écart entre enseignants0,330 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNative American and Indigenous StudiesMême sujetCambodian History and SocietyTravaux en français237 207