Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Editors' Remarks Gina Starblanket and Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark AS THE THIRD PAIR OF COEDITORS for the Journal of Native American and Indigenous Studies (NAIS), we are thrilled to take over responsibility for the journal from K. Tsianina Lomawaima and Kelly McDonough, who finished their four- year editorial term at the conclusion of the NAISA annual conference in Toronto, on May 12, 2023. We began our term after working together throughout the spring to ensure a smooth transition in the work of the journal. In bringing the NAIS journal to a new institutional home at the University of Victoria (UVic), we hope to carry it forward as an intellectually and ethically rigorous forum for critical Indigenous scholarship at local and global scales, building on UVic's long- standing commitment to Indigenous research and extensive relationships with communities across North America and the Pacific. We raise our hands to Qwul'sih'yah'maht Robina Thomas (vice- president Indigenous at the UVic) whose commitment of financial support made it possible for us to take up this work. As a team, we bring shared interests in Indigenous, decolonial, anti-racist, and feminist thought, and an established history of working together on a range of intellectual and pedagogical activities. Our collaborative work includes community- based research initiatives, coauthoring and copublication, and cofacilitation of academic and community- based partnerships and engagements. In all these contexts, our working relationship has been guided by a shared professional and political commitment to the advancement of Indigenous scholarship that is critical, rigorous, ethical, and grounded in the aspirations and needs of Indigenous people and communities. We see the NAIS journal as a forum for generative and transformative interventions, conversations, and knowledge exchanges about Indigenous people around the globe. Under our leadership, we aim to create space for original and inspired inquiries and analyses in traditional, creative, and emergent forms. As we assume coeditorship of NAIS, we understand our role and responsibility as recognizing the critical historical juncture that we are at and that our field must attend to. In addition to longstanding social, political, and economic inequities, we stand in the wake of a global pandemic and are [End Page 1] facing unprecedented crises in not only how we relate to one another as humans but how we relate to creation. We acknowledge that scholarship, too, will be transformed by these contexts as our members work to interrogate the conditions of our times and envision new terms of change. We know that Indigenous theorizing and research continue to arise in the context of long- standing and evolving structures of colonialism, policies deployed in the service of colonialism, and racist and sexist ideologies that have legitimated and continue to legitimate ongoing colonial projects around the world. We are therefore committed to foregrounding Indigenous theoretical and empirical works that decenter colonialism while centering Indigenous knowledge, pedagogy, and methods. This entails a commitment to Indigenous, Black, migrant, antiracist, abolitionist, feminist, and 2SLGBTQIA+ struggles for justice and transformation. Our intention is to situate the journal as a place where scholars will engage analyses of Indigenous movements toward decolonization and social, economic, and political transformation but also projects of Indigenous recovery, revitalization, and resurgence. Our approach reflects the ongoing need for analyses that explore and critically engage with the diversity of Indigenous communities and movements, and/or that deconstruct the colonial and capitalist contexts in which they exist. These include inquiries into specific forms of legal and political revitalization being undertaken by Indigenous communities across geographic regions and cultural groups, land- based practices, critical methodological and pedagogical interventions, Indigenous political theories and practices, Indigenous critiques and contestations, and Indigenous activism, coalition building. Finally, our practice recognizes the crucial importance of encouraging and mobilizing knowledge across generations. To this end, we take seriously the contributions of scholars across ages, locations, and educational backgrounds. Embracing the significant work of Indigenous scholars in creative and artistic disciplines, the journal will continue to speak to and feature the work of those situated in conventional disciplines while also highlighting the importance of scholarly contributions from new and innovative sites of knowledge production. [End Page 2] Copyright © 2024 Regents of the University of Minnesota
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».